Hi, I am doing a project on a sine wave generator circuit. problem: when I simulated it, it gave me triangular wave instead of sine!!! So, Could you please help me discover what's wrong?! or help me in analysing how it works? The circuit schematic is on the following site: xoomer.virgilio.it/fladelle/Page13.htm
In the real circuit, the amplitude is stabilized (and distortion is minimized) by the non-linear resistance of the lamp. As the voltage across the lamp increases, the lamp's resistance increases, thereby reducing the amount of feedback, thereby reducing the loop gain such that the oscillator is just at the verge of dropping out of oscillation, where the output looks truly sinosoidal. If there is too much feedback (or the loop gain >1.000), then the distortion gets so bad that the wave looks triangular or even square.
The nominal resistance of the lamp is 12/0.04 or 300 Ohms. If the filament is not showing any color (cold), then the resistance is much lower, like 100 to 150Ohms. I simulated this circuit using LTspice. In my circuit, the lamp is myR7 (150 Ohms). I only had a model for
2N3904, so I used them instead of BC238.
By playing with the values of yourR5(myR8) and yourR6(myR6), I was able to get everything from no oscillation at all to a low-distortion sine wave to trapezoids to square waves. The collector of Q1 consitantly has a lower distorion output than the emitter of Q2...
I'll leave it as an exercise for someone to come up with a model of the non-linear resistance of the Lamp to improve the attached simulation.
In article , snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com mentioned...
This is _supposed_ to be a simplified form of a Wien Bridge Oscillator. Here's what I see. The C1, C2 and R3, R4 are in the _negative_ feedback loop; they're supposed to be in the positive feedback loop. The lamp is in the _positive_ feedback loop; it's supposed to be in the negative feedback loop. So I don't see why the circuit should work at all. It looks like it's been _too_ simplified! Long ago I had serious doubts, so I cobbled one together, and it didn't work for me at all.
--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@
Nope, the loop gain is reduced as the lamp resistance increases, meaning that the lamp limits the amplitude of oscillation, and it keeps the output relatively distorion free. This means that the circuit is a true Wien Bridge Oscillator.
I further simplified the circuit! In my simulation, I opened the feed back loop between the emitter of Q2 and R4. I injected a sine wave and swept it from 10 to 10KHz. The frequency where the phase shift goes to zero is near 1Khz (which is where it normally oscillates). As the lamp resistance is varied from 100 to 200 Ohms, the Gain varies from 0.9 (wont oscillate) to about 1.2 (oscillates with distortion); The critical value for oscillation with no distortion is ~190 Ohms.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.