Any good Cell Phone Jammer Schematics

May 04, 2006 117 Replies

--- Not true.

We allow all manner of assholes to voice their opinions on _our_ internet and USENET, your post being the latest case in point.

Regardless of how much it rankles you, you have to admit that had it not been for the US you'd still be applying ink pen to paper and buying postage to insult me.

So, we actually welcome assholes like you to become involved and vent, with the hope that once you've gotten rid of your hostility you might be able to make a positive contribution to humankind.

A futile hope, perhaps, but a hope nonetheless.

-- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer

Think so? You need to read the part of the Communications Act of 1934 which deals with "willful interference" with legal radiators before you start casting aspersions.

Hey, it's working for me. ;-)

Cheers! Rich

For those who are just tuning in, he's not in the USA. Possibly not even in North America.

Cheers! Rich

It does not constitute rudeness if a student unwittingly forgets to turn his cell phone off before entering the classroom.

A taser would be more effective. ;-)

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida

On Fri, 05 May 2006 21:37:21 +0100, Never Mind Gave us:

You're an idiot.

On Fri, 05 May 2006 21:40:15 +0100, Never Mind Gave us:

You're an idiot.

From the link in John's post,

formatting link

"The manufacture, importation, sale or offer for sale, including advertising, of devices designed to block or jam wireless transmissions is prohibited."

----------------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to me directly: Replace privacy.net with: totalise DOT co DOT uk and replace me with gareth.harris

and the rest of the developed world.

on

In response to their annoying over-confident waffle, or discussing people's private details in public?

It does when the rules state, "no cell phones".

Thanks, Rich

No, it constitutes an accident. If we want people to have cell phones, we'll have to deal with the fact that, in all innocence, some people occasionally forget to turn them off.

What am I among here -- a set of people so perfect that they never make a mistake? Or a set of people so insecure they *claim* to never make mistake?

Normally, engineers have a relatively humble and realistic attitude toward errors. They know they make them and they know they can correct them.

On Sat, 06 May 2006 10:03:12 +0100, Gareth Gave us:

The guy is OOTC.

On Sat, 6 May 2006 16:34:20 -0400, "mc" Gave us:

It even happens in courtrooms, so these folks are societal dopes.

Should we do the "off with the head" thing with all societal dopes?

Feel good when the shoe is on the other foot?

Hehehehe... What's good for the goose...

On Sat, 6 May 2006 16:34:20 -0400, "mc" Gave us:

Good call.

The fact is, the student was insufficiently considerate of his classmates, the teacher and the rules to ensure that his cell phone was off.

Whether that is a crime of sufficient magnitude to nuke him, all his living relatives, his hometown and his girlfriend's dog is a different issue.

Ed

Does that include Farraday cages?

-

Bye. Jasen

Leave the dog out of this! ;-)

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida

Igbore Rich. He thinks he knows everything, and he loves to start long arguments. He posts under a half dozen different IDs, which says a lot about him.

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required