wwvb receiver chip needed

Hello Rich,

In the shape of a mantle clock it would work. Open chassis, of course, so the discerning visitor can admire. With nixies it would look really cool.

Regards, Joerg

formatting link

Reply to
Joerg
Loading thread data ...

Hello Michael,

Maybe but most WWVB receivers are more crude. They aren't concerned about shape factors and stuff, all they want is enough selectivity to make sure the things sync at night even if in California or Arizona. So there is usally one crystal as a filter, or two in series for the better ones.

Regards, Joerg

formatting link

Reply to
Joerg

Hello Tim,

In that case I'd probably try to do it with a PLL stabilized Q-multiplier instead of a crystal filter. Should work just fine at

60kHz. Or a conversion scheme that puts the IF in the low kHz range where it can be done with active or switched capacitor filters. Still have to stabilize the oscillator though. Just as a proof of concept...

True, $1 is cheap. Custom crystals are less and less popular. Some of the companies I used way back when are no longer there or aren't doing it anymore unless you buy thousands.

Regards, Joerg

formatting link

Reply to
Joerg

I'd guess the specified frequency is parallel resonance with the specified load capacitance.

I have some Digi-Key SE3320-ND 60 Khz xctls (C-2 60.000KC-P).

My best try at measuring the series resonant frequency shows

59998 Hz. Perhaps the 60.002 Khz ones are series resonant at 60000 Hz. I don't have any of those to measure.
Reply to
mike742

My appologies for the late reply but what is a "PLL stabilized Q-multiplier"?

Reply to
garyr

From: "mike742" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 11:09 pm

To help us out, it would be best if you describe your method of testing the resonance frequencies and the accuracy of your frequency meter/counter.

A -2 Hz "error" in frequency is about 33 PPM (Parts Per Million) or 0.0033 %. That seems to be within manufacturer's stated tolerance.

For what it's worth, the spectral occupancy needed by the WWVB signal is roughly 5 Hz. That is good enough to demodulate the AM of WWVB and still preserve the (relative) sharpness of the digital amplitude transitions for purposes of obtaining the correct time of day. Modulation on WWVB is roughly 30% AM at 1 second periodicity.

In my TRF receiver for 60 KHz, the carrier is extracted by amplifying the filtered signal and applying it to an over-driven MC1350P which acts as a limiter. Outside of the (relatively) broad selectivity of the tuned loop (Q roughly 45) and an interstage L-C tuned coupling, the final filter is simply two ECS crystals in series with a small capacitor to ground at the series connection point. The capacitor value was arrived at by "cut and try" substitution, much quicker than trying to calculate everything after an elaborate crystal measurement exercise. :-)

The final selectivity is narrow enough to eliminate most of the LF hash around the spectrum, especially the 4th harmonics of the TV set horizontal sweep frequency. That should work equally well on non- limiting demodulation to get the time-of-day data. [without the DSP supplied by the microcontrollers in the radio clocks...we have two commercial units in the house for that]

Measuring the exact crystal resonance frequency is NOT a simple exercise at 60 KHz. I would suggest looking closer at the Digi-Key links for technical data direct from the manufacturer. Those are found on the Digi-Key final part-number page just below the electronic catalog page PDF link. Manufacturer's data yields the parallel capacitance, maximum series resonance crystal equivalent resistance, and either the equivalent series inductance or the equivalent series capacitance. Digi-Key is excellent in their links to manufacturer's data in my estimation.

snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org

Reply to
LenAnderson

....

I see what you're asking.

The Digi-Key pages says 100 ppm (+/- 6 Hz @ 60 Khz). The Epson web page says they are photolithography-finished and at least one Epson data sheet says the standard frequency tolerance is

20 ppm. Possibly they have no problem hitting 20 ppm and the actual tolerance is much better than that (but not over temperature).

20 ppm is still 1.2 Hz wide and the resonance probably is sharper than that (Q > 50K?).

This measuring project started when I tried to use the Epson crystal data to calculate what the series resonant frequency would be of the 60 Khz parallel specified crystals. After much mucking around with various numbers I decided to measure it.

And you're right, I've been ignoring calibration. Here's how I'm measuring the resonance:

I have a homebrew LC VCO running at 6 Mhz. It's full frequency range is about 5.99180 to 6.0053 Mhz. This is divided by 100 (two 74LS90's) and then low pass filtered resulting in a sine wave around 60 Khz.

The signal level is attenuated via 10k/1k resistors and then fed through the crystal with a 10k load on the other side. There's some additional loading from the x100 gain amplifier and then into a scope.

The circuit around the xctl looks like: .1 10k from-e-follower-lowpass--||----/\\/\\/\\/\\/----+---| xctl |----+---> to x100 amp < >

< < gnd gnd

I can see a noise widened trace on the scope plus some switching spikes/artifacts. As I tune the VCO, the noise trace is flat except at one specific frequency, which is about 1 Hz at most wide where the noise band becomes a sine wave.

I'm measuring the frequency of the 6 Mhz VCO with a Ramsey C-125 frequency counter. It's a standard ICM7216D counter with a cheap 10 Mhz crystal as the time base. It's uncalibrated (other than the factory, not sure of the date, possibly in the 70s?).

Ok, how to calibrate the frequency counter?

And how stable is the frequency counter?

I'm living in a cloud of RF noise, plus computers. In addition the frequency counter is a real RF noise generator too (multiplexed LEDs in addition to the counting circuitry).

By moving the counter and short wave radio to a different room I managed to hear the 2nd harmonic of a 5 Mhz crystal oscillator on 10 Mhz with WWV. It sounded like the beat frequency was lower in frequency than the 100 Hz WWV modulation pulses. So an upper bound of +/- 100 Hz at 10 Mhz would put the upper bound on the frequency counter of 10 ppm.

I'm not really happy with this calibration, I'll have to see what I can do to improve it.

Reply to
mike742

Zero-beat to WWV is hard to do better than 50Hz by ear. Mechanical aids will get you a little better but then at the few Hz level you hit variations in carrier due to ionospheric variation.

For a few hundred $, HP Z3801A's are available on the surplus market. They're a 10MHz OCXO locked to GPS. Short term Allan variation is

10^-12 or better over 1-100 seconds. Many lab counters and a lot of ham radio frequency counters will happily accept the 10MHz reference that the Z3801A makes.

Other telecom-related GPS-locked OCXO's/rubidium oscillators are available on the surplus market too, some make telco-related reference frequencies like 1.544MHz or 19.6608MHz which can be used to calibrate on.

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

I read in sci.electronics.design that Tim Shoppa wrote (in ) about 'wwvb receiver chip needed', on Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Have you tried a Lissajou display?

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
Reply to
John Woodgate

Or use the S-meter to see very low freq beats.

Reply to
Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, th

Here are some measurement of a few Epson Type 2 60 kHz crystals I made recently:

Fs BW Fp 60001.6 4.6 60009.9 60001.2 4.6 60009.7 60002.2 5.6 60010.6 60001.1 4.4 60009.5

The test setup is shown below. The input signal was produced by my homebrew function generator implemented with an AD9833. The clock for the 9833 is an 10 MHz SG-615B which has a specified frequency stability of 100 PPM.

|Vcc | | 20.0k | Vi 0.1++ |-+ 2N5457 -/\\/\\-+--||-||--+->| | ++ | |-+-- Vo \\ \\ | / 1M / \\ 1.0k \\ \\ /1k | | \\ | | | +---------+----+ | V

Reply to
garyr

Check out the latest Atlanticon proceedings, or the upcoming issue of the Homebrewer for a circuit to allow you to see zero beat to within a fraction of a Hz.

..

Reply to
xpyttl

S-Meter! On 'modern' gear?? All they give you is a bank of eye candy in the form of leds.

But, yes -- I've used Real S-Meters to get Real Damn Close to zero best in days past.

73 Jonesy
--
  | Marvin L Jones       | jonz         |  W3DHJ   |  linux
  |  Gunnison, Colorado  |  @           |  Jonesy  |    OS/2   __
  |   7,703' -- 2,345m   |   config.com |  DM68mn              SK
Reply to
Allodoxaphobia

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.