WOW. A NEW DAY 4 AMERICA!!!!

On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:16:17 -0800, Necronomicon wrote: ...

Speaking of stupid voters:

Cheers! Rich

Maybe a test should be required before you can vote, to prove you actually know what the issues are?

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:10:17 -0800, against all advice, something compelled UltimatePatriot , to say:

Jesus wept.

Oh, but you can't top this for stupidity:

You're an idiot.

Heinrich Galland wrote in news:061120081649564508% snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com:

Sorry,Supreme Court already ruled against that. It used to be used to deny blacks the right to vote.

Besides,with a biased mainstream media,most people don't have accurate or a majority of the data on the candidates. The MSM was essentially part of Obama's campaign.They just omitted a lot about him or even downplayed stuff people should have been informed about.

arting to

ature=3Drelated

I'm very aware of Obama's stance on the issues.

Who did you vote for? Did you write yourself in?

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:10:49 -0800, against all advice, something compelled FatBytestard , to say:

Good of you to notice.

Yep... looks like he's one big retard.

Hillary voters, you mean? Or her thinking that President Obama's an Arab?

Cheers, James Arthur

innews:061120081649564508% snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com:

By which Jim Yanik means that the mainstream press didn't share his his irrational suspicions, and knew enough about the Weathermen to know that Bill Ayers wasn't a terrorist - the Weathermen did make bombs to focus public attention on their protests, and some of them were inexpert enough to blow themselves up when putting the bombs together, but they were expert enough to make sure that their bombs neither hurt or injured anybody else.

Jim is a bit too biassed to recognise that the claim that the Weathermen were terrorists was part of Nixon's criminal "Watergate"campaign against his opponents, for which he should have been impeached.

If that's bias, we could do with a lot more of it.

-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

But there are not enough good ones to fill all the posts and the not so good ones are the only ones that will try for office. It matters what you find fun.

Such revisionist history. Clinton actually shut down the bush 1 invasion of Iraq.

More revisionist history. Who was it that had to bribe the supreme court to win election, twice.

I have met blacks worthy of being president of the US, quadroon Barrack is not one of them.

Bullshit, you retarded, grab everything you hear as fact dipshit!

BUSH started AND ended the GUlf War. He put troops in, and he took them ALL back out. Long before Clinton took office.

Clinton had not a goddamned thing to do with it. The only officials Clinton took out of Iraq were inspectors.

If you were any more full of s*it, it would be oozing out of your ears, f*****ad.

Wrong again, f*****ad. NOTHING oversteps the NSA, and that includes the electorate.

They would not even let a pot smoker sit on the Supreme Court Bench, and you think this retarded f*ck that denied being around Ayers for years has the character for this post? You're an absolute idiot.

And no, you don't know the first thing about how clearances are given. Your reply makes that obvious.

You really don't know a goddamned thing about national security, chump.

I'll give you one thing, you are very good at being a loud-mouthed clown. Is your big, foul mouth the reason you can't work around children anymore?

What's your explanation then? The NSA is infested with rabid lefties maybe?