Whats next
- posted
12 years ago
Whats next
The TSA will be wanting them.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
-- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
TSA:"Here, put this one in your mouth, and this one up your xxx."
(citizen complies)
TSA: "No, wait..."
-- Cheers, James Arthur
..
Well, we can see how James Arthur's brain - sort of - works, but that never needed much in the way of technology.
By the time you've registered "bankers good, democrats bad" you've got most of what's there to know.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
r...
Silly Bill, bankers and Democrats are the same thing. Here's a list of Barack's biggest contributors: Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, CitiGroup, UBS, Morgan Stanley...
You've swallowed yet another media myth. Wall Street is dominated by Democrats. Why? For the handouts, of course.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
"Silly Billy"! I love it! ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
And Democrats are uniformly equated with ignorant arrogance. ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
Silly Billie.
Democrats (progressives) also make it more difficult to compete against their friends (read: contributors). Gotta keep 'em down.
m-br...
I would've said "Silly rabbit...," but he would've missed the cultural reference,* just as he missed the earlier one. **
(*) "...Trix are for kids")
(**) Technician, handing probes to patient: =93This one goes in your mouth, this one in your butt, this one in your ear"
Tech: "=85=85=85. Oh,,, wait=85=85"
"=85=85.. THIS one goes in your mouth, this one in your ear,=85=85=85=85=85= =85=85..=94 =96 Idiocracy
-- Cheers, James Arthur
rom-br...
tot
y=85=85=85..=94 =96
That's a cultural reference? More like evidence that James Arthur has an anal fixation - none too surprising considering his output here.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
m-br...
Only by the stupider Republicans, who have this enthusiasm for vapid over-generalisation, which does show up in fools of every political persuasion, but with varying targets.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
m-br...
Jim Thompson would. He lacks the wit to realise that James Arthur's evidence didn't actually support the point that he thought that he was making, revealing James to be the nitwit - again.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
-br...
These are serious bankers, not the small fry making ninja loans that you idolize.
McCain's list isn't all that different - he got less money, but he did select Sarah Palin as his running mate, which is a sufficient explanation. What you are saying is the banking PACs have a lot of money to bestow, rather than that they are strongly biased towards one part or another.
You've not proved that point. You have shown that Wall Street gave more money to Barack Obama in 2008 than it gave to John McCain, but Barack Obama was the more attractive candidate, even before McCain selected Palin as his running mate, which would have put her one heart- beat away from the presidency if McCain had been elected.
As you regularly demonstrate, being a right-wing nitwit does require a certain blindness to reality, which may make it more difficult for Republicans to make it to the top levels of Wall Street, but I've yet to see any evidence that Wall Street is "dominated" by Deomocrats.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
m-br...
heir
That's the American way. As Jeffery Sachs points out in "The Price of Civilization" the American political system is dominated by the rich, who keeps their thumbs firmly on the scales, so that every change works to their advantage. The Democrats look after their rich contributors almost as energetically as the Republicans look after theirs.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
h,
=85=85=85=85..=94 =96
Pop-culture. Since I was replying to Spehro, and since he once suggested this same movie (whose pertinent dialog I've now provided verbatim), I thought he might get a chuckle from the joke.
You need to get out more Bill.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
Sure I did.
I just showed you that Wall Street supported Obama and the Democrats' Party. Even today, now, in this election cycle, Barack Obama has raised more money from Wall Street than all Republican candidates combined.
I'm just tellin' you how it is here, on the ground, brother Bill, I don't expect to persuade you from your prejudices.
I'm not a Palin booster, but Palin would be a huge upgrade over President O. She's more qualified, more experienced, and better looking. Every one of the Republican candidates is better, more experienced, more qualified than our erstwhile community disenchantment specialist.
Our economy would've recovered long ago if any one of those other people had been at the reins these past three years. Obama's been actively holding the economy down. The economy wants to recover. All anyone has to do--to borrow the Administration's phrase--is take this Administration's boot off the economy's neck, and let it.
Meanwhile, Obamacare has jacked up costs and caused masses to lose their employer-sponsored health insurance[1], taxes are set to soar on ordinary Americans[2], Obama's just vetoed 220,000 direct jobs in energy production, upsetting our Canadian friends (who've offered to re-route their line to Vancouver, for China) and killing countless other jobs[3,4].
[1]As someone told me the other day, it's amateur-hour at the Whitehouse.
Obama's truly the worst, most divisive, most incompetent President of my lifetime, Jimmy Carter included. Barack's absent whenever the hard work is being done, petty, vain, mean-spirited, and just plain not that smart.
Of course you don't see it over there reading the Huffington Post. I'm here living it, and you're not.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
l
uth,
=85=85=85=85..=94 =96
I'm not stuck in any kind of closet.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Hey, that was a pretty good line...err I mean, Knock it of children!
Mikek
Silly Billy... fixated on kindergarten-level humor. ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.