No, that's not what I said at all. In the case AT HAND, which had to do with polarized particles, the polarizing field was not in common to both particles.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Velocity of light. by Mathew Orman - Public release record on November 23 2011.
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
..
ly
ed
nt
an
ied
d.
n..
e...
ng
se
9e...
elf
hit
False. Perturbations in an established EM field can not propagate faster than light. Light *is* a perturbation of an established EM field.
Mark L. Fergerson
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Funny Thing. Have you noticed the Copyright owner of this mystery site? I know the spelling is different but ...
Copyright © 2011 Tyrell Innovations. All Rights Reserved.
-- John G.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
I think the key word is also "velocity."
Nobody ever said that the velocity of light is constant, because it depends on direction. If you keep in mind that the OP doesn't know the difference between speed and velocity, it puts his other statements in perspective.
-- Reply in group, but if emailing add one more zero, and remove the last word.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
No relation to me. the only other time I heard the name Tyrell was someone who released an album of synthesized music back in the early '70s. My work was mostly in broadcast & Telemetry where we obeyed the speed of light laws. :)
-- You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
I knew it was not you but it just struck me as funny seeing you have had a bit to say in this thread.
-- John G.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
That doesn't prove anything about their relative emission times.
Also, there is evidence that all light traveling in a particular direction experiences speed 'unification' as it travels.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
ant
Supernova explosions have a magnificent simplicity. The processes that create them are tolerably complicated, but the bottom line is that most of the energy involved ends up as a burst of neutrinos which make themselves scarce at more or less the speed of light. Your reaction makes it clear that you haven't done your reading. You could start here
formatting link
n
Really? Have you got a reference to a paper that spells out this interesting - if implausible - idea?
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Bill Sloman wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@j15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com: [...]
Sure he does. It involves reaching into his ass to get it, though.
Ralph makes things up and is a compulsive liar.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
admformeto expressed precisely :
November 25 seems to have passed at a speed geater than light and lol Where is the Web Site that will tell us all? :-?
-- John G.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Your keyword there was 'more'.
All astronomical theories are based on the false assumption that what we observe here over a short time interval is a true replica of what happened at the source during the same time interval.
They are all hopelessly wrong.
Suire....
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
formatting link
The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages:
The expansion of the universe Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang theory might be right.
The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few minutes after the Big Bang.
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover from the Big Bang.
These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion that the universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
The BB is supported by all American creationists.
Light redshifts with travel because it loses energy.
Little 'bangs' are occuring throughout the universe regularly. They account for the periodic table.
The CMBR is thermal radiation from the whole of space at 2.7K
Where did that hot gas come from?