1. Home
  2. Electronics Design
  3. Velocity of light. by Mathew Orman - Public release record on November 23 2011.
  4. Page 3

Velocity of light. by Mathew Orman - Public release record on November 23 2011.

The Farce is with him?

Reply to
krw
Loading thread data ...

You're absolutely right. I'd never claim a thing like that.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

It's the only thing he has going for him. I wonder if he's related to Sloman, Dimbulb or Maynard?

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

formatting link

formatting link 

--
You seem to be shooting yourself in the foot, since entangled
particles are purported to be able to exchange information
instantaneously, once entangled, regardless of the distance between
them. 

Your claim is rather specious in that you don't explain how subluminal
or superluminal performance can be elicited from a photon in a vacuum.
Reply to
John Fields

formatting link

formatting link

I do not claim any of such. If a photon is created by conventional source it will propagate with relative speed of c. To create photon which propagates with other speed one must create appropriate charge oscillator structure.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto

If a photon is created by any source it propagates at c.

From the quantum mechanical perspective, all photons travel at c.

  1. photons are emitted (by charged particles) 2. photons propagate at c 3. photons are absorbed (by charged particles)

Photon momentum p = h?/c = h/?

Photon Energy E = h?

Reply to
Sam Wormley

I will let history be the judge of that.

If your screenshot shows anything at all it is that you do not have the first clue about how you would go about measuring the speed of light.

At best it might show that your scope has a decent trigger circuit and that is only if the trace is genuine. How are you going to power your spectacular launch of this "product" in Dresden? Using an E-Cat?

Self publicising URL clipped.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Reply to
Martin Brown 

--
First it's: "Public release record on November 23 2011."

Then, on your website, it's to be today, sometime.

Finally, from your last sentence, above, it's: "Wait till Monday and
see it for your self on my website."

Seems like you're working in a medium with a delay caused by a very
high index of refraction.
Reply to
John Fields 

--
You haven't shown any of that, all you've done is shown an image of a
pulse with a delay of 1.21ns from the _image's_ 10% to 90% amplitude
points so, clearly, your confusion is profound to the point where it
would be difficult to lift the veil.
Reply to
John Fields

You will see stereoscopic 3D video recording of the experiment shortly. Published or various download sites including Youtube. Those who will attend the show in Dresden will be able to use their own test equipment and do the experiment by themselves. After Dresden my website will present all the physics and math modeling as well as the name of famous scientist who 140 ago produced experimental and mathematical evidence of instantaneous transfer of energy or information.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto

formatting link

formatting link 

--
Nonsense.

It's more like saying that two entangled men on opposite sides of the
Earth can talk to each other at speeds faster than it takes light to
propagate the distance between them.
Reply to
John Fields

Yes, because the reply was to group of people who claim that apparent effect is based on group velocity. And that is why I published just the pulse and ask them to explain group velocity based on single shot of such pulse. You will see the stereoscopic 3d video of the full experiment shortly.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto

I assure you that your patience will be rewarded.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto 

--
Your picture shows nothing of the sort, and if you think it does
perhaps that's the source of your confusion.
Reply to
John Fields 

--
You keep saying that, but you never elaborate.

Precisely what is this "appropriate charge oscillator structure"?
Reply to
John Fields

Both experiment and spice simulation show zero delay over the arbitrary distance. But wait, when you see the experiment maybe then you will point to the source of my confusion.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto

formatting link

formatting link

Which is not impossible if one man turns on an electromagnet strong enough to affect the Earth's magnetic field thus allowing the second man on the other side to detect changes in magnetic field gradient and interpreting it as information. Such signal transfer will be instantaneous and the common Earth magnetic force field will be the entangling element, so to speak to satisfy your theory.

Mathew Orman

formatting link

Reply to
admformeto

Oink! oink! Flap!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Reply to
Martin Brown

Spice simulation?! ROTFLOL!

Why wait? We can point at you now, as we did a few years ago.

Reply to
krw

I agree. A good laugh is worth waiting for, and you'll hear it from all sides.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.