Many of those who donated to Obama in 2008 will not be repeating their donations in 2012, because Obama's actual performance as President has disappointed them. Further, although no one knows what Romney actually believes in at this point, he does not seem such a frightening alternative to Obama -- both Obama and Romney are moderate Republicans from a liberal's point of view. (If Romney became a boogeyman by, for example, mandating forced childbirth, things might change.) So the chances of Obama's raising even more cash than when he enjoyed the rosy glow of 2008 are quite small. I predict he'll raise about half what he did in 2008.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
K
krw
I notice Dick Ligar was turned out on his ass, today. ;-) Maybe there is some hope.
K
krw
on
You already have. No need to show everyone else.
Some won't. The vast majority will. They've been bought.
Like I said, you *are* stupid. You must listen to nothing but DNC talking points.
Like I said, you *are* stupid.
You really didn't need to dig deeper. Competing with Slowman?
M
Michael A. Terrell
They need to do like the VA has: If the people want the service, someone donates the land and they build their own bulding.
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.
J
josephkk
I have spent sufficient time in both arenas and the above is just plain false. Some are diligent, most government workers only want a position, not a job. Presuming you understand the difference.
=20
J
josephkk
what's
on
72
So what. Kerry raised very nearly as much (within a few percent, 376 M$ vs. 328 M$). Plus in 2008 Obummer much more notably out raised McCain about 2:1 (745 M$ vs. 368 M$). That's what the data on your site says. Now you tell me that GWB "bought" an election and BO didn't?
?-)
B
Bill Sloman
what's
theory on
.
you
that
tell.
00008072
e
rs off
ing
krw thinks that anybody who doesn't share his views is stupid.
This is revealing.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
B
Bill Sloman
There are other aspects to prostitution - beyond the transfer of money
- which Michael Terrell has probably forgotten about. Suffice it to say that kind of activity doesn't pay well enough to fund an election campaign.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
B
Bill Sloman
ary
Government is the biggest protection racket in town. Protection rackets are obliged to protect their clients from other protection rackets. This does involve competition, but we are talking about a natural monopoly, and the dynamics don't offer any kind of stable multi-player equilibrium
You and James Arthur certainly don't, but you aren't exactly at the state of the art in the area.
Giving us the vermiform appendix and the peacock's tail.
"*Think* for a change: Anti-trust laws reduce the trend for one entity to be in charge" wasn't exactly the politest way of - falsely - claiming that I was wrong.
Your own insult machine is fairly highly developed, but you get upset when your insults are redirected back at their source.
Sort of okay. It looks as if I can buy some EP13-3E55-A100 low distortion ferrite cores in Germany - they are offering three weeks delivery, which tends to mean "not ex-stock, watch this space" but the cores aren't going to be all that much better than stuff that I can buy ex-stock from Farnell.
If the 3E55 cores don't make it I'll use the equally heavily gapped N87 cores that I can get.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
J
John Larkin
We have jobs and you don't, so it looks like our economic models work better than yours.
In, what, 2020?
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
J
Joel Koltner
Yes, but if you can just put up a second box and anyone else can delivery anything they want to do (as newspaper do), it's not exactly an
*effective* monopoly...
Because it's not that black and white -- the real question is generally more, "How many people need to be using public transportation before we'll call it effective?" Obviously, if the number is zero, it's not effective... and I have heard of cases where the numbers are shockingly low (well below predictions), in which case I'd be the first to say there's something wrong with the policy.
It's not a strawman: Even if I'm the laziest, most welfare-defrauding individual in the country, I still receive the full benefit (many thousands of dollars per year's worth) of the U.S. military's protection... which is pretty darned good, I'd have to say! And yet -- if I am that individual -- do you think I'd voluntary pay for that service? No way! I'd sooner spend that sort of money on getting my 4x4 mud runner going again, after having broken the axle last time I took if off-road, thank you very much!
So if military protection isn't an entitlement to me, I sure don't know what is.
It's more or less the National Guard, I believe.
Lots of money and influence, I suppose. Of course, you get the same thing from private industry, and a few well-heeled individuals as well. It's too bad so few politicians can't bring themselves to largely ignore campaign donations when it's time to consider policy...
---Joel
K
krw
But there is no law against putting the NYT in the NYP box, even if one the NYP owns it. There most certainly is a *federal* law (enforced, too) against putting either in a USPS box, even though *you* own it.
In 90% of the country, it certainly is.
...and we don't call it "effective" unless everyone is forced to use it, right?
I know of once case where it would have been cheaper to issue each commuter a Rolls and driver. Here, they're talking about a $7B transportation bond (to be paid for by a 1% sales tax increase), of which almost 60% will go to mass transit, even though only 5% of the people ever use it. ...and the roads are a mess (on the *other* side of town - not too bad here).
It *is* a strawman. The military is right there in the Constitution as a necessary part of the federal government. I've yet to see mass transportation in there. The post office, sure, but no one is really talking about eliminating it, just making it work.
Oh, good grief! Inventing definition is worse than a strawman.
Nonsense.
Where unions are involved, sure. You can keep them.
J
josephkk
Add campaigning for best choices as you see them.
?-)
J
josephkk
what's
theory on
supporters.
you
that
tell.
72
the
the doors off
Check the available data at opensecret.org. Obummer is on track to collect even more this time.
?-(
J
Jim Thompson
Huh?
"Open Secret
Open Secret offers support and a safe space to people of all ages who have been affected by abuse.
Our services are confidential and free to anyone living in the Forth Valley."
Is Obummer molesting fellow Demoncrats ?:-) ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
formatting link
| 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
J
josephkk
have
Valley."
That's what i get for typing it in instead of copy and paste:
formatting link
2
Oops.
?;-)
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.