I recall once seeing a fully solid state circuit that uses capacitors, resistors and a transistor to "mimic" the effects of an inductor. I can't seem to find it now. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
See the various Gyrator-based filters on the S.E.D/Schematics page of my website.
...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | |
formatting link
| 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
I read in sci.electronics.design that Reg Edwards wrote (in ) about 'Solid State Inductance', on Thu, 6 Jan 2005:
Get some decent Mumetal cores. 10kH in about a 2 inch cube, with a laminated core. More with a toroid. Q indeed was not promising at 1 kHz, but this operated at 10 to 20 kHz.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
Capacitor CC is just for decoupling. Inductance appears across points A and B Henries approx' (R3 in parr' with R4) x C1 x R1 This example gives L = 10H R1 controls the 'Q' value
As you can see the circuit is very similar to a simple emitter follower but adding just R1 makes a vast difference electrically . It's more usual to use a opamp follower in place of the transistor as it can give better performance. There was last Feb', a long thread here from Terry Pinnell, ("Coupling capacitor voltage rating") demonstrating that this kind of gyrated inductance can inadvertantly appear without even being asked for.
It's much more immune to external signals induced by external varying magnetic fields. Traditional coils may require mu-metal shielding to get near as much immunity, which usually costs a lot of money, and there's nothing obscure about money. There are probably a few more obscure things such as hysteresis, core saturation and inducing signals into nearby coils that an "electronic inductor" doesn't do. OTOH, real inductors don't need a separate DC power supply to have inductance. Like most anything in engineering, there are many trade-offs, and which one is best depends on the application. There are still plenty of applications where a "real" inductor is the best or only solution.
To understand the concept you have to go back to the '60's where every new product that used transistors instead of tubes had the words "Solid State" proudly displayed, often in a fancy cursive italic font, on the front panel. Just using copper wasn't enough.
OTOH, you can make a gyrator with a vacuum tube as the active element...
One reason is size... You can build a massive inductor with a gyrator, in a volume that is tiny compared to the equivalent real inductor. Some years ago, I designed the first modem, to use this design to handle the internal inductor needed. The key was in this case, that the inductor at that time could not be fitted into the low profile wanted, without taking an inordinate amount of board space. At the time the people handling the approval testing were amazed at how well it performed, and just how small the line interface could be made. Most modern modems now do this.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.