Here's a test:
>Which has lower gun problems:
>DC with it's idiotic gun restrictions, or
>NH with no gun restrictions.
>
>I'll give you a hint, it ain't DC. It is proven time and time again
>that the gun restrictions don't save lives, or make the environment
>safer, then only give the criminals the peace of mind knowing that
>when they break into a home, they are safe!
..and D.C. will be SO much better with MORE guns because we all know that the USA (because it is the most-armed nation) has the lowest firearm murder rate. Oh, wait...
Your one-data-point analysis is pretty clueless as well:
formatting link
formatting link
. . If you're going to post from Google, you should learn HOW:
formatting link
Another hint: Blockquoting someone else's *sig* is DUMB.