Re: dark adapted

> Please be advised that the human eye is a *lot* more sensitive than a

>> PMT. > >For a sufficiently crappy PMT. Good ones are several orders of >magnitude better than the eye, and even more orders better than APDs.

I thought eyes were good enough to see a few photons. (I'm not sure about the time scale associated with that claim.)

If we are down to counting photons, how can I get "several orders of magnitude better"? Is that just spreading out the photons over a longer time chunk? So eyes can see N photons per second and PMTs can see (with some probabilty) N photons per many-many-seconds?

--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer\'s.  I hate spam.
Reply to
Hal Murray
Loading thread data ...

That claim is quite strange, since many animals active at night have much better sensitivity than humans.

If the human eye would be as sensitive as claimed, then why do passive night vision systems create a usable picture even in a cloudy night.

A quick search showed quite a few references of 1-5 % quantum efficiency, one even claimed up to 10 % quantum efficiency.

CCD claims quantum efficiencies in the 50-80 % range, so there would at least one order of magnitude.

Paul

Reply to
Paul Keinanen

They can have mush larger sensitive area than that of the eyes, so are proportionally more sensitive in that sense.

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

In certain special circumstances, some people's eyes can see bursts of

30 photons or so in the blue-green. That's in the presence of lots of background noise in the form of phosphenes and other artifacts. If you take a photon counting PMT, jack the threshold up to 3 photons or so, and reject ion events with an upper threshold, the dark count rate of a PMT is essentially zero, and that applies to PMTs of basically any size, up to 20 inch diameter. (There are some pulse height histograms on P 9 of
formatting link

So electrically speaking, that's 20 dB just from the threshold difference, plus probably 3 orders of magnitude from the area difference--even assuming that the eye has a detection probability of 1 for those 30-photon bursts, and in spite of the inherent advantage of spatially resolved detection, where you can ignore noise in other locations.

The eye is a remarkable detector, but PMTs are pretty remarkable too.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

My family owns Seneca Caverns (Pendleton County, WV, **). There are locations in there where I've waited for 20-30 minutes, and still couldn't see my hand in front of my face.

** My father (James R.) and an uncle (Wilmer) wired that cavern for lighting when they were teenagers (~1936). They used to play games with cutting the lights and see who could get out quickest ;-) ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
              With Half My Brain Tied Behind My Back
              Still More Clever Than Mr.Prissy Pants
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Also, it take time, and lots of it, for the human eye to get that light adapted, and it only takes a few moments of bright light to ruin it!

Charlie

Reply to
Charlie E.

Looking at the newsreels for some night vision systems in Irak/Afganistan, the man portable systems did not have any large apertures.

In some countries, conscripts are trained to avoid loss of light adaptiotation starting at their first week of service.

Paul

Reply to
Paul Keinanen

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.