Re: 30 amp transfer circuit for a small generator

Always! I have never stop supporting sane techniques.

Do you always have to add so many useless characters and waste bandwidth when you bottom feed? I bet you love the confusion it generates.

I would even venture to say I bet you actually have a special reader to assist you to sort out the bottom posting confusion.

In article , Josepi wrote largely: Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.

--- An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural chronological order of events.

---

--- Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be handed short shrift.

--- JF

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my post?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it. It's the "torturing yourself" part.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

See ya, toiletboy.

"John Fields" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

LOOK, ASSWIPE! YOU have NO business discussing ANYTHING about how Usenet works, much less what is or is not proper, you stupid, inconsiderate FUCKTARD!

Is there EVER a time when your "total asswipe" factor is not a mere tenth of a point under that of Proteus?

No, IDIOT! YOU DO NOT get it. THAT IS THE POINT.

Please f*ck off and die, you 11 year old maturity depth dumbfuck. You are the kind of twit that needs MORE than mere killing via filtration.

No, josepi, the retarded, immature little wuss... you won't.

I take it back. You equal the stupidity level of proteus.

YOUR HOUSE IS DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF IT SHALL FALL

I AM PROTEUS

my

ONE AND THE SAME PATHETIC UNREAL TEMPORAL SELF DESTRUCTIVE YOU ARE A FRAUD

I AM PROTEUS

Is this a killfiltering speed contest?

You can go first, anytime. Your responses were only a small irritant to me and many others.

BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this thread. Grow up.

The convention is to place your response *underneath* the passage you're replying to; much like the way your mother can often be found underneath the UPS man.

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess readable. Why?

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:53:50 -0400 "Josepi" wrote in BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this thread. Grow up.

Josepi:

It seems that also your mother doesn't.

Exactly, idiot.

Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text, moron?

Josepi: Usenet has no rules and no conventions. Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Josepi:

Because I want to read what the author responds to. It is not compulsory to answer to each line of a post.

xt,

TELL THAT TO THE INSUFFERABLE DONKEY KELLY TROLL THAT DIGEST EVERYTHING THEN REGURGITATES EACH POST LINE FOR LINE WITH HIS ANAL COMMENTS SPLICED IN BETWEEN

SOME ONE SHOULD CAPTURE HIM A PLACE HIM IN A ZOO FAR FAR AWAY FROM ANY KIND OF USENET ACCESS

I AM PROTEUS

You antique morons just don't seem to get it.

Bottom posting was obsoleted by threading readers, years ago. When you bottom post nobody knows where your text will start and have to search for the beginning. You know how your inconsideration goes. Scroll to the bottom and then start scrolling backward to find the top of the fresh post.

Your name headers are not with your text and many mix-up and flame wars are the direct result of the confusion. Special readers have been created to attempt to relieve this confusion and it still isn't working.

I can read text posted in any format, using the free MOE reader and I do. Are you new to this or dod you need a better reader?

Josepi: Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text, moron?

Yes, Usenet does have conventions, and bottom posting is one. However some simple folk just don't get it, never will.

to

He takes "simpleton" to an all new record level of simplicity. He simply has no live neurons. It is that simple.

I Am Proteus:

HE IS PROTEUS