OT: Public transport

Not sure how needlework will save you.

Why? It's just accepting some people are inferior. You surely can't believe we're all the same?

Bigots think that the can identify inferior people on the basis of easily accessible information - skin colour or speech accent. This really is insane.

The Scottish wanker is too dim to realise this. I do know quite a few Scottish non-wankers.

On Jun 22, 2023 at 11:55:31 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.16zb6typmvhs6z@ryzen>:

Equal rights and equal capabilities are not the same.

On Jun 23, 2023 at 8:42:30 AM MST, "Snit" wrote <G3jlM.38385$ snipped-for-privacy@fx10.iad:

And more than that, you assuming a group is inferior based on your bigotry is not about the group, it is about you.

And more competition. And nowhere nice and private to take them. Fuck city life, you're an absolute moron if you like noise.

Food is distributed to all parts of the country. I eat the same food as city folk do.

On the rare occasion it's required, I travel to the city.

Never heard of commuting? Driving is fun!

What?

There's such a thing as compromise. Quoting the two extremes only proves you to be a fool.

My point exactly.

So they're becoming normal, slowly.

No it isn't. Make believe is for 6 year old girls playing in wendy houses. Adults doing so are f****ng imbeciles and should be wiped from existance.

No such thing as a democracy in this world, I've certainly never seen one. In no country do we really have a say in anything.

That I can agree on.

Of course they are. A more capable person is more valuable to society.

I assume people are inferior when they are.

On Jul 23, 2023 at 9:24:37 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.18kjvb2amvhs6z@ryzen>:

There is a clear difference. Not sure how to help you see what you insist you are blind to.

At least you admit you merely assume. That is a step in the right direction for you.

Because what you have is a belief, like a religion, there's no logic to it, so it cannot be explained.

I assume what is 99% likely.

My lifetime watch-phrase is - *NEVER ASSUME - CHECK*!

On Sep 4, 2023 at 11:59:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.2argdgzrmvhs6z@ryzen>:

How is it "religious" to understand the difference between the two concepts of "equal rights" and "equal capabilities"/

They are clearly very different concepts... nothing religious about it. I think the closest you could get is to try to pin down where equal rights come from... but general morality is not tied to religion.

You assumes it IS 99% likely. Often without evidence. Or reason.

If you walked outside and got soaking wet, would you check a weather app to make sure?

C'mon, dopey! I'd check the weather App *BEFORE* I walked outside! ;-)

You could do the same if you had an iPhone!

I can do the same on any phone. And have more choice of apps since I don't rely on Apple-only shit.

Did I try bluetoothing files to you? It doesn't work, because it's an Apple.

You assign rights to someone less deserving. This is illogical, and is therefore a belief. If you owned two vehicles you used for a business, and one was larger and carried twice as much goods, you'd pay more attention to maintaining it than the other one.

You're not making any sense. If I say there's a 75% chance of rain and it doesn't rain, you can't say I was wrong. The % is a guess, it doesn't need to be accurate.

On Sep 19, 2023 at 12:40:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote <op.2bicx1p8mvhs6z@ryzen>:

One does not need to earn rights... that is why they are rights.

What is illogical about equal rights?

Irrelevant comment.

Good you see your claims are not accurate. That was sorta my point -- you make up inaccurate claims and want them to be accepted by me and others.

Seventy-five percent is better than chance. If you have better data, share it... This isn't about guessing, it's about the intrinsic randomness of physical reality: there really IS no fault in measurements with error bars. Calling reality 'not good enough' is childish arrogance.