OT not pro gun, but very smart about how laws are an invasion

Better we should get you to decide if someone is mentally incompetent. You have lots of experience with incompetence and probably mental illness too.

And what's your better solution? Let people who hear voices, who have tried to harm themselves or others, who are a danger, walk around among us? Wait, I have a better idea. Let's give them all assault rifles.

Yes, give everyone a gun, especially the mentally ill. We have to protect the Constitution!

ROFL

Wrong, always wrong.

Reply to
Whoey Louie
Loading thread data ...

Whoey Louie wrote in news:1f3a8026-d183-40ea- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Fuck you, retard.

You attacked me before. You are toast.

You always get a plate of shit, and here you just did it again,

*stupid*.
Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Many people have irrational fears. They are called phobias and universal h ealth care can provide coverage for treating that.

Bottom line is the present health care system only works for some people an d others are left without healthcare. It is time to fix that and join the many other countries in the 21st century.

We pay for health care in this country and it is more expensive than virtua lly any other place in the world. We aren't doing it right, we are doing i t very wrong because we seem to always be willing to cater to the special i nterests. We could adopt a system like they have in a England or many othe r countries in Europe, have better health care and spend less money.

But we may need to treat the phobic *before* we can get this enacted.

--

  Rick C. 

  + Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging 
  + Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply to
Rick C

1) Define "Assault Weapon". 2) Give a *useful* definition of "Assault Weapon" (hint: the government couldn't the last time it was tried). 2) What is this "need" thing? 3) You don't believe in this "Constitution" thing?

Of course you would. Who cares?

Reply to
krw

If you mean a AR15 is an "assault weapon", yes, I know several people who use them for hunting. It's a very versatile base to build a very nice hunting rifle on, depending on the game.

Reply to
krw

You aren't too bright, are you?

Sure it can be amended. Go for it! Until figure out how to get 38 states to agree, STFU.

Reply to
krw

There's that slope getting slippery, as it always does with you lefties.

If it sounds like a duck...

Go for it! It only takes 38 states to agree with you. Good luck with even half that many. Good luck getting that many people to agree on _anything_, these days. IOW, you're wasting your time.

There really isn't any point. You've shown your hand.

You're a liar, too.

But you want to ban *GUNS*, liar.

WTF cares about "need". You're projecting again. The left loves that form of argument.

Tough shit. If you don't like their logic, the directions to change it are right there in the document. Good luck with that.

Reply to
krw

You mean, like owning guns?

Reply to
krw

That's easy. The type of gun least useful for self protection.

Is that good enough?

Actually, there was a restriction on a class of weapon that would typically called "assault" weapons. But it was allowed to expire.

formatting link

Here is your definition.

--

  Rick C. 

  -- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging 
  -- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply to
Rick C

snipped-for-privacy@notreal.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

The .223 round is even more accurate in a proper, longer barrel, bolt action, single shot, purpose made hunting rifle, from where the round was filtched to start with.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

sing a

go.

, a

he best

od.

lt

pink

sies

ck.

rmer

the

shared it with everyone I knew. Some actually didn't explode.

In America, gun ownership is a right and health care is a privilege. Some people really need to readjust their sights."

so sad that the many inferior countries to the US have universal healthcare and we have Republicans who want to remove the health care we've managed t o scrabble together. Why do people hate healthcare for others?

A slightly irrational anxiety, given that the US health care system costs h alf as much again per head as the French, German and Dutch systems, and rou ghly twice as much per head as the somewhat more spartan UK system. They al l deliver appreciably better health outcomes than the US system does.

At the moment the US is stuck with an over-priced and under-performing syst em, and the people make money out of it describe the alternatives as "socia list" to frighten off dimwits who think that the communist system was socia list.

Oddly enough, it was Bismark who invented the "national insurance" healthca re system, to undercut his socialist political opponents.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Freud would roll over in his grave if he saw the DSM. The DSM is designed t o sell drugs that is the last thing Freud wanted to do.

Look up Preludent. It is/was a drug given to mental patients who are only u nder observation, It is a time release barbiturate coating a very powerful amphetamine, they give it to the person the night before and in the mornin g the person is all jittery, this is some powerful speed. Can't think strai ght. So at the hearing their worst asshole relative get their money n shit.

I know people who abused it. I tried, it wasn't my type of buzz so I didn't keep doing it. But it is a very powerful drug, so much so I don't recommen d even trying it.

I think before such a hearing they should be prohibited from giving you any drugs for about 36 hours so they can see how you really are. If you really are nuts then you are, but in court all drugged up ? If you have a court c ase and sa beak for munch, and you have ONE beer with a burger and they fin d out they don't want to hear for you anymore.

Do they drug up murderers on trial ? That would be illegal wouldn't it ? O pens wide for an appeal. But in nut court there is no appeal, you get their treatment for X months or whatever then go back for another hearing. And i f you tell the court "They are giving me this drug" the court will say "It is prescribed by a doctor you need it, they have to give it to you". If you have experience with drugs you know how to maintain - or you don't get tha t much experience like in prison.

Some people are so good at raising kids that all their kids want is their m oney and they go into the cheapest hellhole nursing home to die as soon as the kids can get them there, and the doors lock.

In a way I guess they have reaped wht thay have sown.

Reply to
jurb6006

It's not an irrational fear. We already have a govt full of programs that we can't pay for. It's running on borrowed money and the debt is piling up fast. That can't continue forever as Greece recently found out. Except Greece going bust isn't a big deal. The US would be.

Why not give everyone a nice house, car, free food too? Actually that's what the libs want to do. That fool Andy Ying Yang says he'll give everyone $12K a year, free and clear. Just add that to the things we can't pay for too.

No, only some people pay for it.

and it is more expensive than virtually any other place in the world. We aren't doing it right, we are doing it very wrong

And yet most of the new life saving drugs come from the USA and when someone in one of those other countries wants the best care and they can afford it, they come here.

because we seem to always be willing to cater to the special interests.

And having a national healthcare system will be catering to special interests too. Who do you think wrote the Obamacare law?

We could adopt a system like they have in a England or many other countries in Europe, have better health care and spend less money.

Almost everything I see govt to, every interaction I have with them, shows that govt is far less capable of doing things right and cost effectively. And there is a logical reason for that, there is no competition. They can screw up, have poor service (the VA is a healthcare example) and it doesn't matter. No one gets fired, no competitor puts them out of business, because it's a govt monopoly.

The question we should be asking is why is it that insurance works for cars, life insurance, home owner's insurance, business insurance, etc. The one place it doesn't work is healthcare. We need to understand why free markets don't work when it comes to healthcare. Part of it is clearly that they are not free markets, but already heavily regulated.

Reply to
Whoey Louie

Passing an amendment through 3/4ths the states to give universal suffrage to dolphins would be an easier task than amending the 2nd Amendment for any purpose.

Reply to
bitrex

I'm stealing that, hope you don't mind.

Reply to
jurb6006

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news:dcf16cb4-f61a-4008-9ffa-fe9bd1f77762 @googlegroups.com:

This thread is not very porpoiseful...

Why no Porpoise? You guys are suposed to have porpoise!

What porpoise do you serve?

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Make it the Federally-mandated color scheme of the Constitutionally-authorized Citizen Militia.

Reply to
bitrex

"The family of a man pardoned by Gov. Matt Bevin for a homicide and other crimes in a fatal 2014 Knox County home invasion raised $21,500 at a political fundraiser last year to retire debt from Bevin?s 2015 gubernatorial campaign.

The beneficiaries include one offender convicted of raping a child, another who hired a hit man to kill his business partner and a third who killed his parents."

Wut a bunch of scumbags.

Reply to
bitrex

You don't have to steal it I hereby grant you an eternal royalty-free license to my "intellectual property" there or whatever.

Reply to
bitrex

Heh! why didn't I think of amending my post that way...

Reply to
bitrex

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.