>
>
> =A0> 2. The carriage of concealed arms for the purposes of self defence
> =A0> should be allowed, where a person has undergone appropriate training
> =A0> and can show a genuine requirement for such arms.
>
> What would you see as a genuine need? I'd see a need if you are actively
> involved in the drug trade, if you are in a bikie gang, if you have
> upset a bikie gang, or if you live in Melbourne and your name is Moran.
>
> If someone is going be authorised to carry a concealed firearm, then the
> training should be to the same standard as the police (or at least the
> standard that the police should be held to), including target
> identification and marksmanship, and subject to annual re-qualification.
> Also some limitation on the type of weapon carried.
>
> Whats anti-gun about that?
Why do you see the need to somehow associate drug dealers and bikie gangs with licenced firearms ownership? Does it somehow make you feel morally superior?