[OT] EDN cover art FAIL

For those of y'all still on the mailing list, take a closer look at the cover of the current (15 Dec) edition of EDN. I guess that nobody in their design review process thought to check the temperature scales. How embarrassing...

--
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb
Loading thread data ...

For those, like myself, not on the mailing list, here is a link to take a look...

formatting link

Hilarious!

Reply to
Marc Guardiani

More specifically:

formatting link

Reply to
JeffM

So what's so funny with that picture? I'm probably too slow to find anything worth a buzz...

Why so much excitement? Did I miss something?

--
******************************************************************
*  KSI@home    KOI8 Net  < >  The impossible we do immediately.  *
*  Las Vegas   NV, USA   < >  Miracles require 24-hour notice.   *
******************************************************************
Reply to
Sergey Kubushyn

Your puberty?

Scale mismatch

Reply to
MrTallyman

What's the problem? I see a thermometer reading 100F, with parallax error so it looks like 120F.

Reply to
Clifford Heath

So what? What accuracy do you expect from a graphic art? 0.1%? 0.000001%?

And there is also parallax involved. Did you learn in school what parallax, perspective, etc. are?

It might come as suprise to you but all those monsters on SciFi pieces of art are also out of scale. Sometimes even more than 5%....

And did you ever wonder where the censors were when approving e.g. Salvador Dali pictures? Did they ever measure the roundness of that melted clock?

--
******************************************************************
*  KSI@home    KOI8 Net  < >  The impossible we do immediately.  *
*  Las Vegas   NV, USA   < >  Miracles require 24-hour notice.   *
******************************************************************
Reply to
Sergey Kubushyn

Minus 40° F does not equal minus 30° C.

Reply to
tm

"Dang, Marsha, it's -40 degrees outside!" "Celsius or Fahrenheit, John?" "Yup." "Oh, John." "Marsha!"

The top of the scales may even be correct (120 F is about 49 C and one could be generous and assume that is how it's aligned) but the freezing point is an obvious clue, even if one doesn't have the "-40" factoid readily to hand.

--
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

So what? It's not a scientific chart, it's just a graphic art.

--
******************************************************************
*  KSI@home    KOI8 Net  < >  The impossible we do immediately.  *
*  Las Vegas   NV, USA   < >  Miracles require 24-hour notice.   *
******************************************************************
Reply to
Sergey Kubushyn

True, it's just funny that EDN, the self-styled "Voice of the Engineer" would have such an obvious mistake. If it had been on People Magazine, that's one thing, but no alarms went off there? Ouch.

--
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

-20F -20C

-40F = -40C

Reply to
krw

Hopefully this isn't indicative of the Ryerson engineering students get:

formatting link

They've only been allowed to grant degrees since the 70s.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

D'oh! I was thinking, yep, that's hot, not even looking at the cold side.

Reply to
Clifford Heath

The latest Electronic Design has an OK cover. It's the insides that are the failure:

formatting link

And the article about the Varian brothers was nonsense.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Calling -40 -30 is more than your stupid numerics.

Get a clue.

Reply to
MrTallyman

Wrong, dumbfuck. You can squirm all you want. Too bad that it will be to zero effect.

Did you, you retarded f*ck?

Reply to
MrTallyman

You are pretty much a goddamned retard, and you did not even need inebriants.

The only melted clock in this thread so far, is the one between your ears.

Any idiot can see what is wrong with the picture. Any sane, intelligent person certainly can.

It is blatantly obvious that you qualify below either of those points of reference.

Now stop trying to act all smart (you ain't), and try to go figure out what is wrong with the picture, asswipe.

Reply to
MrTallyman

"We can't get mawwied..."

Reply to
MrTallyman

You're not a scientific old fart, you're just a 'well below lay person' mentality dumbfucktard that thinks that technical scales are "art".

Trust me, you are NOT the "Illustrating Man".

All you have illustrated here is your inability to grasp things, and then you run 'round in circles trying to make it look like your lack of knowledge was harmless.

Don't want dopes like you working at my company, chucko.

Had you fessed up to the error.... MAYBE.

Right now, you are as bad, if not worse than the Obama retard is.

Reply to
MrTallyman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.