OT: Ebay Bidding

Nice! ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

       Make the world a better place, dismember a Democrat.
Reply to
Jim Thompson
Loading thread data ...

An entirely separate issue is sellers submitting a ghost bid when they feel the item is going for too low a price. They will still be stuck with the eBay fees, though.

Reply to
Richard Henry

You also draw attention to the auction by bidding early, which may make the final price higher. Especially in test equipment, there are some pretty hot properties that don't attract a lot of bids. Last year, I got an HP 35665A dynamic signal analyzer, in perfect shape, with almost all the options, for $330. Best bargain since I bought my wife's wedding ring. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058

email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

You never know how much the high bidder has bid. In the last remaining minites I will try a low bid or two and see if I can locate the highest bid. Then in the last minite I go for the max I would want to pay. In the case of really wanting something, you start to sweat.

I won a 1966 Datsun 1600 a couple weeks ago. My new toy.

formatting link

greg

Reply to
GS

Hi Greg, how much did you pay for this beauty ?

h
Reply to
hamilton

You sometimes do know. If the winning bid is less than the minimum bid increment above the 2nd highest bidder then what you see is the actual amount that was bid by the high bidder.

Nice!

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

The bids you see are not the amounts that people have bid!

At any time, the highest bid you see is the *second* highest bid plus the bid increment [*]. At the end of the auction, the winning bid is also the *second* highest bid plus the bid increment.

Consequently, you cannot reach any conclusion about the actual highest bid by watching the bids come and go.

As others have pointed out, your optimum strategy is to decide the highest amount you're willing to pay, and then bid that amount close to the end of the auction. The amount you actually have to pay will again be the *second* highest bid plus the bid increment. This will be the same as your bid only in the case where the *second* highest bid was just a bit less than your bid.

In particular, there is nothing to be gained by making multiple bids. You should bid only once. If you still think it makes sense to bid more than once, then you still don't understand the process.

[*] Not strictly true, because there is an uninteresting edge case where the highest bid is higher than the second highest bid, but by less than the bid increment.

Sylvia.

Reply to
Sylvia Else

And when two equal high bids come in at the last moment. Then the earliest wins.

tm

Reply to
tm

This is true. A bidder has to weight this possibility against the possibility that an earlier bid gives others (who are not bidding optimally) a chance to rethink their bids.

The usual stragegy for dealing with this is to bid a whole number of dollars plus a random number oc cents. It doesn't eliminate the possibility of an identitical bid, but it does reduce the probability.

Of course, it slightly goes against the philosophy of bidding the highest one's willing to pay (which is theoretically an immutable amount of money), but thw pilosophy can probably tolerate modification to this extent.

Sylvia.

Reply to
Sylvia Else

Well, I paid more than I would have liked, but isn't that usually true?? $6600.

California car, no rust on body or frame. Bad top, and the bumpers are less than perfect. Somebody did a very good paint job.

greg

Reply to
GS

The biggest trick is to win by bidding 1 cent more than the second highest bidder. I achieved that only once.

--
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply
indicates you are not using the right tools...
nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to
Nico Coesel

I would stay away from whole figures like $30, and use $31.50 or something like that.

greg

Reply to
GS

Rich Grise expounded in news: snipped-for-privacy@example.net:

..

Yes, on some things, that is the only way to get a deal. Everyone tends to get greedy and do the wait-and-see, even on hot items. But this never works-

As soon as one bid is made, the buy-it-now option is gone. And then by the end of the auction, the price soars way past the buy-it-now price. Nobody but the seller wins that one.

Decide what it is worth to you and then make a choice.

I've bought a few things with the buy-it-now that were a give-away compared to similar finished auctions (you can also look at selling history with completed auctions). I often wondered to myself at the seller's wisdom in this.

Buy-it-now is also quick.

Warren

Reply to
Warren

Dave Platt wrote on 10/29/2010 4:30 PM:

Yes, I know this is an old post...

I sometimes bid on things just to see how cheap I can get them. I was working with 100 watt LED modules and bought a couple at $3 or so. Then I thought I would bid on some auctions to see how much they go for. I ended up buying another five or so because I put in the opening bid of $1 and no one else bid! I got a battery charger, stepup converter for $0.50 the same way after paying $2.50 each for a couple.

--

Rick C 

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms, 
on the centerline of totality since 1998
Reply to
rickman

was

Then

I

for

Look up Snipe Bidding. Very useful. I've been using PowerSnipe for over ten years...

John :-#)#

Reply to
John Robertson

One day many years ago, I manually sniped and bought something on ebay. Another bidder was using some sniping software but must have had badly set allowances for network delays set in his software or something. He contacted me afterwards and he was really really angry because I bought the item for less than the limit he set in the sniping software. He thought it was somehow unfair or impossible that his sniping software didn't beat me. He was also very upset that I didn't want to sell the item to him, not even for more than I had paid. Heh, if he really wanted it then he could have placed his highest bid early.

Reply to
Chris Jones

Doesn't anyone else use esnipe.com? I won a car with a low bid using esnipe and they only charged their max fee of $10. Normally they charge

1%.
Reply to
Tom Del Rosso

I use Gixen.

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

it

In

't

I

he

d

He was an idiot blaming you for his problem.

People, eh? Can't please 'em!

John ;-#)#

Reply to
John Robertson

Doesn't that require you handing over your user ID and password to them? If so, do you think they can be trusted?

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Reply to
Cursitor Doom

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.