OT: *Bang* you are dead

G > If you found out that foreign spooks G > were involved with vaccines injected G > into your bloodstream, you wouldn't G > be alarmed, right Slow man? BS > Not unless Osama Bin Laden lived just BS > around the corner. And the spies probably BS > got better training in how to inject BS > vaccines than the local health workers. BS > They wouldn't want to blow their cover BS > by making the people they injected sick. You don't think the spooks would try to sterilize a hostile population? Are you really that ignorant of their actual history, Slowman?

Reply to
Greegor
Loading thread data ...

It seems unlikely. Something that created a more immediate effect would be more attractive.

I've yet to hear about any such exercise.

I imagine that Greegor may have some demented conspiracy theory in what passes for his mind, but who cares.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

G > If you found out that foreign spooks G > were involved with vaccines injected G > into your bloodstream, you wouldn't G > be alarmed, right Slow man? BS > Not unless Osama Bin Laden lived just BS > around the corner. And the spies probably BS > got better training in how to inject BS > vaccines than the local health workers. BS > They wouldn't want to blow their cover BS > by making the people they injected sick. G > You don't think the spooks would try to G > sterilize a hostile population? BS > It seems unlikely. Something that BS > created a more immediate effect BS > would be more attractive. G > Are you really that ignorant of their G > actual history, Slowman? BS > I've yet to hear about any such exercise. BS > BS > I imagine that Greegor may have some BS > demented conspiracy theory in what BS > passes for his mind, but who cares. Attempt to cause dictators hair to fall out? Exploding cigars? Germ warfare on Chicago? Tuskegee syphilis? Hello?

Reply to
Greegor

--- Typical Slomanesque response: When you can't counter, snip the damaging bits and issue ad-hominem epithets.

---

--- I proved it was a lie and - since you were left indefensible and unable to refute the argument logically - you chose to reply with an ad-hominem insult instead of with reasoned discourse.

---

--- Once again - true to form - you come through with irrelevant ad-hominem bluster.

---

--- You have neither pointed out with any degree of veracity that my claims are deluded nor that they're false, all you've done is use a scattergun approach to randomly fire epithets in the hope the shots will momentarily take the focus away from the issue at hand and allow you to slink away with your tail between your legs.

---

--- Shouldn't you have written: "You're a nitwit,"...

-- JF

Reply to
John Fields

That is a way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it is to say that I get bored by tedious nonsense, and I imagine that everybody else does too.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Goodbye.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Yes, he thinks the CIA actually *is* engaged in a cunning plan to sterilise the muslims with vaccines.

Time to back away slowly ...

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

JD > Yes, he thinks the CIA actually *is* JD > engaged in a cunning plan to sterilise JD > the muslims with vaccines. JD > Time to back away slowly ... -- John Devereux That's dishonest rhetoric. I never said they actually did such a thing, but they have a history of doing even more outrageous things. If you were a citizen of country X and found out that CIA agents actually were involved with vaccines, you would have good reason to be quite alarmed. Do you think such national intelligence services are of particularly moral character? Maybe you can be a character reference for KGB, Savokh, Mossadh as well as CIA? Having any of those agencies actually involved with vaccines is a bad idea.

Reply to
Greegor

BS > You're nitwit, Fields, and you haven't [...] JF > Shouldn't you have written: "You're a nitwit,"... -- JF Careful! Catching an Aspie at a spelling error could send them into a rage.

formatting link

Reply to
Greegor

You expect otherwise from a lefty?

I would be rather alarmed if X = USA.

Morality isn't even the issue. "What's in it for them?"

Reply to
krw

It is hard to know precisely *what* you are saying, it is all innuendo and leading questions. But it seemed that way to me.

No they do not. You are talking about the literal genocide (forced sterilisation) of entire populations.

No

Nobody is disagreeing with that AFAIK.

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

--
If that were true you'd have stopped posting a long time ago.
Reply to
John Fields

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkH3PdDZZuA
Reply to
John Fields

--
:-)
Reply to
John Fields

Hmm, I wonder what pushed your button on this one?

Ahhh, got it.

Of course. And greegor.

These national - and indeed global - vaccination programs... they smell a bit *socialist*, don't they?!

OK, you can have people buying flu shots and so forth. But to get herd immunity you might need 90% uptake, hard to get that with a free market. Without that herd immunity a lot of vaccines are not so effective.

And to get global *eradication* you need an internationally coordinated effort, sustained over decades with no monetary payoff.

Doesn't sound like shareholder value to me.

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

I'm sure you wonder about what day it is.

That made about as much sense as you usually do.

I had no doubt that you couldn't read. You've demonstrated it long enough.

Idiot. Do try to stay on topic.

You really are an idiot. The discussion was about spooks not vaccinations. Now crawl back in your hole with Slowman.

Reply to
krw

krw wouldn't, but his idea of "honest rhetoric" is anything that matches his irrational delusions. He's never mastered the concept of "evidence".

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.