OT: ATF to Require Multiple Sales Reports for Long Guns

...and your point is?

The ATF has already closed the majority of dealers using stupid arbitrary and minor rulings on paperwork and they are now adding this rule on some weapons .. to add burden to the few dealers that exist. Until finally nobody has the right to bear arms..

Complete nonsense.

" snipped-for-privacy@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

He's right about ATF closing down FFLs for minor paperwork errors.

I don't see any problem with reporting on multiple long gun purchases,though. Does that occur very often,outside of border areas?

Minor paperwork errors on long gun purchases? That *was* the point of the article posted.

I don't see the issue either, which was the point of the article.

Registration is just another step on the path to confiscation.

Thanks, Rich

he first sentence is FACT.

Happens in WA; cannot say for other states as to how uniformly this new rule is being enforced.

And it has been used on occasion by loco police.

Robert Baer wrote in news:4NWdnQnKqcaShpLQnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@posted.localnet:

reporting to ATF on multiple gun purchases is not "registration". ATF would still have to visit the dealer to read the 4473's for each gun,unless the FFL closes down,when his record book would go to ATF,who probably does scan them into an illegal database.

Registration has nothing to do with it.

... and nothing to do with the point of the article.

" snipped-for-privacy@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

but NOT "complete nonsense". he was commenting on the incremental erosion of our Second Amendment rights,and the comment about ATF revoking FFLs for minor paperwork errors is accurate.

Perhaps, but that wasn't the point of the article. He used the article as substantiation for that claim; a lie.