We wonder what Constitution those judges have been reading. Because
> the Constitution we've read clearly states under the Second Amendment,
> "[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be
> infringed."
> Despite the Second Amendment's clear message, three justices
> dissented.
Oh, come on... I'm a second amendment supporter, but it's definitely twisting things to leave out the bit about "the militia" and not conceding that it was poorly written -- regardless of how you'd like to interpret it. Wikipedia has lots to say about it:
formatting link
---Joel