On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:23:17 +0000 (UTC), snipped-for-privacy@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us:
You sure don't know much about security issues.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
O.T. Harddrive Partitions?
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
LOL is that the best you can do.
There are no problems with security issues and the join command.
-- -- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
I have NEVER had a PC to outlast a hard drive. You are luckier than you realize.
Bo
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:48:58 +0000 (UTC), snipped-for-privacy@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us:
Windows 95 was ALL security holes, you dumb fucktard.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
If a business, shouldn't some form of RAID be used...?
Michael
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Yes but none of them had anything to do with the "join" command. Did they? You claimed that the "join" command intorduced a security issue. Since what it does is a subset of what the "mount" command does on a unix or linux box, we know it wasn't the case.
-- -- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:43:12 -0000, jasen Gave us:
Windows *ALWAYS* swaps to hard drive swap space, regardless of RAM size or allocated swap size.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
In pre-XP versions you can set swap-file use to 'conservative'. There is currently nothing in my swap file.
Graham