NIF

formatting link

--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc

formatting link
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators Custom timing and laser controllers Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

Reply to
John Larkin
Loading thread data ...

hype. What counts is the energy: 1.85 megajoules.

Gasoline is about 35 MJ/L, so that's 1.85/35 = 5.28e-2l, or about 52.8ml.

52.8 ml = 3.57 tablespoons.

"

formatting link
"

NIF is often described as a promising new source of energy. That is very unlikely to happen.

Regards,

Mike

Reply to
Mike

Is that like "passing gas" ?:-) ...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at

formatting link
| 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Reply to
Jim Thompson

Well, it's rather trivial to get more than 1.85 MJ from a shot of fusion, for any macroscopic quantity of material. The equivalent volume of gasoline has no bearing on overall system efficiency.

Try a well reasoned criticism instead.

Tim

-- Deep Friar: a very philos>

Reply to
Tim Williams

Something's not right, where did the rest of the 500TW go?

500TW = 500TJ/sec, but no mention of the LASER pulse duration...

1.85MJ out is an awful efficiency, unless that was *per* LASER (192 of them = 355.2MJ ~= 11L of petrol), but still many orders of magnitude less energy out than was put in?

*confused* !

Chris.

Reply to
Chris

"Chris

** Power = 500 exp 12 watts

Energy = 1.85 exp 6 joules

Pulse duration = 3.7 exp -9 seconds

** There is no way to know the efficiency from the data given in the story.

... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

Assuming evenly distributed energy, isn't it along the lines of:

P = 500TW = 500TJ/sec E = 1.85MJ

t = 1.85MJ / 500TW = 3.7nS

Reply to
Dennis

"Dennis"

** Is there a bad echo in here - or is he simply backing me up ?

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

ZZZzapety-doo-da. Very precise zappety-doo-da.

Reply to
MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet

Read it again then, dufus.

Reply to
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers

Mmm, your post wasn't among the headers when I posted. So I guess given the time stamps I'm backing your answer!

Reply to
Dennis

Read article. Very narrow pulse.

Yes, the efficiency is extremely low. That's why it will never become a usable energy source. It's only good for studying the secondary explosion in a hydrogen bomb.

The primary explosion is fission from plutonium. This provides the energy needed for the secondary, which is fusion. But treaties prohibit testing with actual bombs, so they use supercomputers to model the process. Some parts of the process are not very well understood, so they need to do actual experiments. That's the purpose for nif. The explosions are tiny and do not release any radiation, so they do not qualify as actual hydrogen bombs.

But selling it as a possible future energy source is just a scam. They know it can never be turned into a fusion reactor.

Regards,

Mike

Reply to
Mike

The fusion energy released pershot is about equal to the caloric value of one jelly donut.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com   

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin

The entire shot is around 30 ns, and most of the energy is near the end.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com   

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin

It's the biggest laser in the world, and I was wondering if it was the biggest electronic gadget. Probably not. CERN probably has more electronics, and a Google data center even more.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com   

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin

_trillion_watts/

52.8ml.
29/"

very

Interesting technology. I am particularly impressed with the conversion efficiency from infrared to ultraviolet. But the efficiency from the flash pump is horrible. Quote:

"of the 422 MJ pumped into the capacitors, only 1.8 MJ makes it into the reactor chamber."

formatting link

So to reach breakeven, they would need to generate more than 422MJ on each shot.

There are other problems with cooling the lasers and finding ways to prevent radiation damage to the enclosure. These put breakeven out of reach with their approach, even though they promote the hell out of use as a fusion rector for power generation. For example, see

formatting link
formatting link

They do talk about weapons research:

formatting link

But if they were really interested in commercial power plants, they would have engineers looking at ways to prevent radiation damage to the shell, and looking at ways to cool the lasers to provide continuous operation. They don't talk about these kinds of problems, and there seems to be no effort to working on them besides posting web pages that discuss pie-in- the-sky dreams. So it is clear the only real reason for nif is weapons research, and to train newcomers to atomic weapons.

Which is fine. I'd much rather they do that than play with actual hydrogen bomb explosions.

Regards,

Mike

Reply to
Mike

;)

It's harder doing it twice with the same apparatus, though.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

formatting link

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

gasoline

For anyone who hasn't seen this, it's a great period piece, both for the physics interest and the 1950s movie style:

formatting link

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Well, the other inertial confinement machine, the Z machine, really had a problem, that would release a 32 megaAmp pulse into a "hohlraum" made of gold foil with copper contacts. It must have blown the contacts, etc. to bits, as they only did a couple shots a YEAR with that machine. But, I gather that gave them significant data to work with.

The NIF has a huge evacuated sphere with windows for the laser beams to shine in through. It is supposed to handle many pulses/day.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Elson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.