Mains voltage zero crossing detector with optical isolated output

Prettier. I wonder what's wrong with this one?

Grant.

...Jim Thompson

Yet another total retard who thinks that a moderated group gets you somewhere.

You would certainly NOT be on the list, and in no way could even be a part of forming said list.

Hire someone? Regulators? You're an idiot. Go back to the kook group.

Learn how to trim your quotes too, idiot.

AlwaysWrong.

No, you completely have no clue!

You belong with the rest of them.

Jamie

And is also why things back fire and end up going the wrong way.

Facts are facts, If I were a judge, and I am not, my first thought about this matter would be to question JT ambushing JL into a corner?

Having a bunch of blind followers does not make a good case in court. It usually ends up back firing, very badly at that when most of their damning evidence has a no show.

Jamie

Poor Sonny was taken, when it should have been his X.

Note that the author, in 1979, followed one basic rule of synchronous design. The async Fin signal goes into a single clocked flop, in one place only, and the output of that flop enters a fully synchronous logic domain. I don't know when this concept was first recignized. I do know that the PDP-8 and PDP-8i, and the first PDP-11, were hairballs, full of RCs and delay lines, clocks all over the place. Tne first PDP-11s had a tendency to hang up.

That input sync is exactly what we've been preaching.

Seems awfully complex, though.

Thing is, Green Apple Books is nowhere as cool as Powells'

SoothSayer? We can have fun with that.

SoupSprayer

ToothPayer

PouffeMayor

something like that?

_does_

Name calling is legal... that's free speech ;-)

Implying incompetence or unprofessionalism _is_ tortious interference. ...Jim Thompson

I guess Larkin didn't notice, you have to PAY to get listed. I receive those all the time, too. ...Jim Thompson

_does_

who

then I

Good luck getting a judge to hear that case, once the transcript of your SED postings hits his desk. You'd get laughed out of court.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

You should see a doc about that multiple personality problem, Slim.

What? And break tradition of ranting without reading ?:-) ...Jim Thompson

Larkin thought it would sing, so I added hysteresis...

Then he added his usual insults and implied I know nothing about ESD diodes... he's _against_ allowing currents in ESD diodes when I do allow a little bit, but _for_ current flow when I protect against significant amounts.

Larkin is just a hateful, vile old geezer (make that hag on the rag :-)... he _is_ just a few years younger than I. I haven't quite figured out why he needs to tear down everyone but his sycophants... but I guess that's the usual behavior of losers.

BTW, I can do this also with a 555, thus annoying both Larkin _and_ Slowman ;-) Watch this space. ...Jim Thompson

Then why did you violate this basic rule of synchronous design, and why did you fight so hard against recognizing the existence and hazards of the runt PE pulses?

_does_

who

then I

And Larkin's posts?

If you had followed my advice and checked out my nav-bar, you'd note that I have an _army_ of lawyers at my disposal... and they all like me... I win patent disputes for them.

And you should also know very well, it'd go to arbitration, where my greatest joy would be watching my lawyers break Larkin into his two personalities ;-) ...Jim Thompson

If he appreciated safe synchronous design in 1979, why does he not now? None of the answers to that question are good.

What's a WoolyBully? An especially agressive sheep?

--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc

Precision electronic instrumentation Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators Custom timing and laser controllers Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators