1. Home
  2. Electronics Design
  3. Looking For Help with a Fluke 196 Scopemeter

Looking For Help with a Fluke 196 Scopemeter

Does anyone have any experience with one of these?

I have been trying to get a simple ac waveform to measure correctly on this and it just won't display it properly.

Basically if I attach the 10:1 probe to an AC transformer with say 6 VAC output, the displays says it is 7.3 VAC, but the waveform will occupy 4 divisions on the scale at 5V setting, indicating over 20 volts.

Have I missed something here?

Normally, on my old CRT scope, you just pick the volt per division and the the waveform sits nicely within them, and will be sized accordingly.

Also it seems that device automatically adjusts the scale so the waveform fits within a few divisions.

A have the unit to manual config.

I have borrowed this unit to measure the transients in a project I am working on. The pdf manual I got from Fluke doesn't go into the voltage settings, except to basically raise or lower them.

I have reset the device, and calibrated the probes.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,

- Tim -

Reply to
Tim
Loading thread data ...

Probably. A "6VAC" transformer is spec'd as putting out ~6V RMS at its rated load, typically, and under *no* load will put out rather more... such as 7.3V RMS.

A 7.3V RMS sine wave have a peak-peak amplitude of 2*sqrt(2)*7.3=20.6V, which if what you're getting by counting divisions, right?

This gets even more fun when you go from dBm to volts or divisions...

Reply to
Joel Koltner

Yes - 7.3 VAC RMS (what the meter shows) is 20.4 volts peak-peak (what the scope shows).

It is likely that the transformer will output somewhat more than its labelled voltage when lightly loaded, or with high line voltage. Measure the transformer with a "normal" meter to confirm (or otherwise) the 7.3 VAC reading.

--
Peter Bennett, VE7CEI  
peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca  
GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter
Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca
Reply to
Peter Bennett

OK, so if I work the waveform equation backwards, I can work out the voltage of the transient strikes that are killing the circuitry on the other side.

I take it the scope is reading the peak and the meter side is is reading RMS values.

I must have known this stuff at some point in my life....

Thanks for the info.

- Tim -

Reply to
Tim

If it's really transients, chances are that a scopemeter is too slow for that, not enough bandwidth. Depends on what sorts of spikes you suspect. You might need some TVS there.

That's the customary way. Meters read RMS and scopes show the waveform, they cannot "show" RMS because they display the whole sinewave. What some scopes can do is calculate the RMS and display it in a corner somewhere as a numerical value.

[...] 
--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

rated

7.3V

which

I believe that is what this one has been doing, and I was too dumb to see it.

I check the machine, and it was peaking at around 142 VAC, with a 50VAC mechanical meter counting the pulses. Now I know the values to put in to stop the problem. The voltage was exceeded by about 50% of the max for the components. No question as to why they failed.

Thanks to all for your concise replies.

- Tim -

Reply to
Tim

Lets see here at 6 V RMS 6*1.414=8.484*2=16.968 P-P Now at 7.3 RMS 7.2*1.414=10.3222*2=20.64444

Rup. Looks like I know Kentucky math!

it appears that your scope is working fine because what you're seeing is a Peak To Peak reading when accounting for those 4 divisions vertically. 20VPP is what you're seeing..

But your scope is giving you the base line to RMS reading from what I can tell. Which is most likely what you're after.

Here, this may help you!

formatting link

Reply to
Jamie

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.