Inverse Marx generator

all the

the charge

resistors.

charge'

all to

in

but

are

C1, and

losing

not

ball-to-cloth

energy

If you like air hockey pucks better do it for them instead. You can even assume any spins you want including no spins. Please continue.

Well let's consider this test case you just described. There was energy stored in each capacitor before closing the switch. There is none afterwards. Where did it go? How did it get there?

The collapse-the-wave-function theory?

John

Heat, light, e/m radiation, sound, maybe some chemical changes in the switch material.

The capacitors also lost a little bit of mass. Actually, that's where the energy came from.

John

So. Mr. Guru, is the Universe going to collapse back in,back to the point at which it began, or expand forever? Or will it go out with a blink and just disintegrate?

You forgot the FART ;-) What a dork! ...Jim Thompson

Sorry; #1 = You cannot win. #2 = You cannot break even. #3 = You lose (every time).

Which proves that something is lost, or the process has a cost, as each cycle is decaying.

It requires 'work' to 'cast' the electrons 'across' the face of the plates. :-)

Kind of like playing "Trouble". The surface gets crowded with electrons and a few get lost when the pressures bump around.

Which also demonstrates that, when he really tries, JF can use Spice to break aby circuit he chooses to break.

What's shocking is that JT and JF need to use Spice to analyze something as EE101-basic as this, and then manage to get things wrong.

John

On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:40:48 -0500, John Fields wrote:

--- Oops...

This is what I meant:

Version 4 SHEET 1 880 680 WIRE -336 80 -384 80 WIRE -224 80 -272 80 WIRE -128 80 -224 80 WIRE -16 80 -48 80 WIRE 96 80 64 80 WIRE -224 192 -224 80 WIRE 96 192 96 80 WIRE -384 288 -384 80 WIRE -112 288 -112 128 WIRE -384 400 -384 368 WIRE -224 400 -224 256 WIRE -224 400 -384 400 WIRE -112 400 -112 368 WIRE -112 400 -224 400 WIRE -64 400 -64 128 WIRE -64 400 -112 400 WIRE 96 400 96 256 WIRE 96 400 -64 400 WIRE -384 480 -384 400 FLAG -384 480 0 SYMBOL sw -32 80 M270 WINDOW 0 32 15 Left 0 WINDOW 3 32 44 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName S2 SYMBOL cap -240 192 R0 WINDOW 0 -44 35 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -42 62 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 1e-7 SYMBOL ind -32 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 1e-3 SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=.7 SYMBOL cap 80 192 R0 WINDOW 0 -37 33 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -40 61 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 1e-7 SYMBOL voltage -112 272 R0 WINDOW 0 -53 5 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -242 110 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value PULSE(0 12 .012 1E-6 1E-6) SYMBOL diode -336 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 32 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 32 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value 1N4148 SYMBOL voltage -384 272 R0 WINDOW 0 -53 5 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -242 110 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value PULSE(0 12.3 0 1E-6 1e-6 .001) TEXT -376 424 Left 0 !.model SW SW(Ron=1e-6 Roff=100Meg Vt=6 Vh=0) TEXT -376 456 Left 0 !.tran 0 .1 .002

---

You should belay the dumb shit, dumbshit.

Would not zero internal resistance cause an infinite current flow, John?

One cannot model this in your famous 'ideal circuit' manner.

Unless you really want to go down that path, Mr Infinitophobia man.

Dag Nabbit!

Hysteresis of the domains only causes heating but the only cost is phase shift, because all that energy does get conserved? Or does that heating also have a cost. Or is it eddy currents I am thinking of?

I think Larkin has gone nutso.

As for hand analysis, I'm the pro. Try me :-) ...Jim Thompson