Well, then it appears he was aware of the possible offence. I still think it's a sign of an immature personality to be offended by such nonsense.
Also I think he has a point protesting the raid--after all, it's the businesses, particlularly gastronomy, in rich countries that profit most from illegal immigration. Rightless people are cheap and tame.
Absolutely.
robert
It has already, on this thread. From the ususal suspect(s).
Fortunately, as long as it stays on Usenet.
robert
I had questioned burning of the flag to be "treason" at one time, but apparently I was corrected. However - I would bet that in the infant days of the flag when laws were still being developed and there were things done to people who seemed to be against this country young as it was - I bet "they" would have been punished greatly for the same thing. It could have been interesting to be back there to see.
How about a javascript web page, "click here to burn a flag."
John
That was a concern. The plutonium bomb was an unknown, which is why one was tested at Alamogordo. The uranium bomb was well enough understood that the first one was dropped on Japan.
The designers did insist on using a fancy radar altimeter to detonate the bombs, without a barometric backup. That was pretty risky.
John
Are you new here? He's been a rabidly psychopathic neocon ever he gave his life to Lord Dubya. ;-)
Actually, that's probably _why_ he gave his life to Lord Dubya. ;-)
Cheers! Rich
If you have been here long enough or bothered to google you could see that he was a rabid neocon even before GWB's father was in the White House.
OK, fair enough. My excuse is that I hadn't even heard the term until just a couple of years ago. :-)
Thanks! Rich
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required