- posted
5 months ago
Fluke has lost their mind
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
Sometimes I also question their design decisions. I have the Fluke 8845A bench meter. It puts out around 10V (!) in the ohms ranges. That will easily blow reverse Vbe of a modern RF transistor which is often 2-3V abs max. Some might just zener and still kind of work but their noise figure and possibly hfe might then be shot. The old annealing trick by crunching a burning cigarette butt on top of the transistor won't work well anymore since they are flea-sized plastic packages, and almost nobody smokes anymore.
My cheapo Harborfreight meter applies less than 300mV. So right now on an RF board I am using a $5 meter because the $1000+ meter isn't up to the job.
At the very least I'd have expected Fluke to provide aselectable lower voltage while sacrificing accuracy. Being off by 0.1% in the ohms range sure beats blowing an unobtanium RF part.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
I paid $275 for an original crispy flavor(*) Fluke 87 in about 1989.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
(*) apologies to the late Jim Thompson
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
I should add that I'm very fond of these DMM probes:
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
When Fluke took over Philips Instruments, they tried to sell me a replacement for my Philips PM2518. The salesman was talking rubbish about the Philips putting out RFI on the test leads and the Fluke 'specification' sheet was just a glossy advert full of glib phrases that were obviously designed to cover up the limitations of their meter.
I wrote to their technical department requesting a proper specification sheet and received another copy of the advertisment - so I wrote again saying "Have received advertisment, now please send specification as requested".
The next day I got a 'phone call from their chief salesman. He was furious and told me I was a fool not to buy one of their meters and nobody expected a specification sheet that showed up where the meter might lose accuracy (the Philips specification *booklet* had graphs to show the areas of greatest and least accuracy). What a way to treat a potential customer!
I bought another Philips before Fluke could stop their production.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
I was just probing a very tight board with a sewing needle.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
torsdag den 9. november 2023 kl. 23.58.20 UTC+1 skrev john larkin:
that is basically what these are,
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
Yes these are very good probes, but the reverse banana style for the very old Simpsons didn't fit.
Cheers
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
Darned board. ;)
Phil Hobbs
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
Cool, a $1300 handheld DVM.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 months ago
Imagine cutting the needle in two, splinting it back together but bridging the gap with a 950 ohm 0603 resistor, and soldering a coax center to the top end. You now have a tiny many-GHz 10:1 probe.
At most signal levels, such probes don't need a ground.