Coming Soon th the USA...

The restriction on tinted windows here in the UK is for safety reasons.

Try driving around at night with mirrored sunglasses on and see how many near misses you have, especially with cyclists and pedestrians!

The window tint limits required are primarily for safety reasons. In dull conditions and at night, the driver's ability to see is severely hampered by excessive tints. Not all countries have regulations as strict as the UK. In these countries a number of road deaths have been directly attributed to the driver being unable to see properly through a heavily tinted front windscreen. In addition it is helpful for other road users to be able to see the driver of the vehicle, particularly at junctions. Motorcyclists are also subject to laws restricting tinted helmet visors.

Motor Vehicles first used before 1 April 1985: The windscreen and front side windows must allow at least 70% of light to be transmitted through them. Motor Vehicles first used on or after 1 April 1985: The light transmitted through the windscreen must be at least 75%. The front side windows must allow at least 70% of light to be transmitted through them. If the glass is tinted to a point whereby it lets through less light, then the vehicle does not meet legal requirements.

Not "Big Brother" but common sense!

Reply to
Brian MW0GKX
Loading thread data ...

In the US we used to mock and deride places where Police said "Papers Please!" and citizens here felt protected by our vaunted Constitutional Rights.

The places with tribunals and cops saying "Papers Please!" were always far away and a subject of scorn.

A man was driving a pickup trick a few years ago and the police were looking for a suspect that in NO WAY did he resemble but they asked for his ID/drivers license. He asked why.

They arrested him and it went all the way to the US Supreme Court, with massive support on both sides. Citizens rights groups of various kinds on one side and Law Enforcement interests on the other side.

The US Supreme Court KNEW that if they heard the case there was no legal basis in the US to force identity without REASON. Rather than be forced to disgrace Law Enforcement, the US Supreme Court simply refused to rule on the case.

The terrorism threat has been abused to expand government authority in the USA.

Ben Franklin said those who would give up Liberty for Security deserve neither.

REAL security does not involve LEO's demanding ID from a guy in a pickup truck who blatantly does not resemble the suspect they seek.

The biggest problem for the Supreme Court and the LEO's involved was that the pickup truck was rigged with cameras and the video of the actual Police stop played on YouTube.

In addition, video captured by cameras mounted in Police cars has been more of a LIABILITY for LEO's (boon to citizens rights) than an asset in prosecution.

In some cases, video ends up with unexplained gaps, despite perfectly working equipment.

In one case video where a woman was strip searched by male police officers was produced, but one thing visible in the video was another camera recording, and that footage had not been handed over to attorneys suing the LEO's. That case was particularly bad because the woman cops strip searched was a victim/complainant arrested by mistake.

In the UK it's my impression that Law Enforcement doesn't have to put up with any such citizen exposure.

Almost anything Law Enforcement in the UK finds awkward can be declared a state secret.

Inch by inch the USA is heading for the same situation. Gradual Socialism is not seen as a threat.

You're worried about window tint?

Reply to
Greegor

Last time I looked Argentina was not in the EU.

Brits can drive in Belgium or France on a UK drivers licence.

There is also he crucial distinction between being a tourist staying for less than 6 months and a resident.

That's OK in the UK. You just have to take it along to the police station within a fixed period of time.

Regards, Martin Brown

Reply to
Martin Brown
[snip]
[snip]

I've seen side-window tinting here in AZ that had a cut-out so you could see the rear-view mirror.

...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at

formatting link
| 1962 | It's what you learn, after you know it all, that counts.

Reply to
Jim Thompson

=A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson

There's also a safety aspect in being able to see into the car, if you can see the driver is looking at you know he has seen you, if you can see he's playing with his CD player, you know he hasn't.

-Lasse

Reply to
langwadt

Not so for EU driver's licences, at least until age 70.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

LCD window glass obscurers. Flip a switch, and glass is black. Put one on your tag as well.

Good for going through intersections when you shouldn't, robbing banks, and late night 'f*ck-in-the-car' sessions.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Liar! Jim Backus is dead!

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Thurston Howell III?

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

Delicious!

formatting link

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Mr. Magoo.

--

formatting link

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account:

formatting link

There are two kinds of people on this earth: The crazy, and the insane. The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

The US lost the "war on terror" the day the federal government started strip-searching American citizens at the airports.

I think right now Osama ben Laden, the Taliban, the Al-Queda, the Mujahadeen, etc. are rolling on the floor laughing their asses off while they watch the US government doing more damage to the country than any "terrorist" could even _DREAM_ of doing.

Thanks, Rich

Reply to
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian

Worse, we lost when we the people let our panic and hysteria stampede congress into passing the damn fool legislation that setup the conditions that made it possible, for example:

HR2883: Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002

HR2884: Victims of Terrorism Relief Act of 2001

HR2888: 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States

HR2926: Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act

HR3162: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001

HR3275: Terrorist Bombings Convention Implementation Act of 2001

HR3448: Bioterrorism Response Act of 2001

HR3525: Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002

HR3986: To extend the period of availability of unemployment assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in the case of victims of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

H.J.Res. 71: Designating September 11 as Patriot Day

S1372: Export-Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2002

S1424: A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent authority for the admission of "S" visa non-immigrants.

S1438: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002

S1447: Aviation and Transportation Security Act

S1465: A bill to authorize the President to exercise waivers of foreign assistance restrictions with respect to Pakistan through September 30, 2003, and for other purposes.

Reply to
JosephKK

Curious, no one would ever bother making that statement about a John Smith.

Still it is nice to have had a famous namesake. I prefer to remember him in what was considered his best role as James Dean's father in Rebel Without a Cause

--
Jim Backus running OS/2 Warp 3 & 4, Mac OS X and Win98SE
bona fide replies to j  backus  jita  
demon  co  uk
Reply to
Jim Backus

Then you would have enjoyed the video the link points to.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

I have that on DVD. (Saw in it theater when first released.)

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
 I love to cook with wine     Sometimes I even put it in the food
Reply to
Jim Thompson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.