CO2 study

Fly ash, CO2, SO2 ond the rest are fall down from the air "polluted" by the smoke and birds..

The solar panels do not produce the fly ash, CO2, SO2 ond the rest. So You'd lose. S*

What do we need fly ash, SO2 and excess CO2 for? Plants evolved long before we'd invented coal-fired power generating plants, and will survive long after we've out-grown them.

Dream on. You certainly can't produce a conscious conclusion that could be taken seriously.

The ligthning work all times and start the open fire. The open fire and volcanos was the only means for transport the minerals to each place on the Earth.

The bio-coal is not serious? See:

ve

It doesn't produce much SO2.

s to each place on the Earth.

Wind- and water-based erosion works pretty well, if you wait long enough. H igh places tend to end up rather denuded.

be

It's a serious way of extracting money from gullible greenies. The US corn ethanol scam was an equally fraudulent way of buying farm votes. Brazilian ethanol from sugar-cane does seem to be more or less economically sound, bu t they'd still get more energy per acre from a real solar-powered generatin g plant, though the initial capital investment is a lot higher.

The wildfire produce. You want to suppres the fire. It is an error: "Fire suppression, in combination with other human-caused environmental changes, has resulted in unforeseen consequences for natural ecosystems. Some uncharacteristically large wildfires in the United States have been caused as a consequence of years of fire suppression and the continuing expansion of people into fire-adapted ecosystems. Land managers are faced with tough questions regarding where to restore a natural fire regime." From:

Wind- and water-based erosion works pretty well, if you wait long enough. High places tend to end up rather denuded. Wind and water transport minerals into oceans. The minerals come back as the salmon: "Typically, salmon are anadromous: they are born in fresh water, migrate to the ocean, then return to fresh water to reproduce." From:

The future is in electric car and electricity produced from bio-coal. S*

I don't, and I certainly didn't say so

It would be, but not one that I made.

Eventually. But they finally end up in oceanic trenches ad get recycled by vulcanism. You have to wait even longer for that.

The salmon swimming up the rivers don't really compete with the silt going down them.

The future probably does belong to the electric car, but the electricity is more likely to come from large solar thermal generating stations in sunny places.

Growing stuff to make into bio-coal isn't a particularly efficient way of capturing the sun's energy, and shipping coal around is a waste of effort. Power lines are much tidier.

But there are also birds.

Plants must be growing and burned:

The wildfires and fire places did the same result. Now some part of dry plants is fired in stations. What are the prognosis for the bio-coal and bio-gas? "Biomass can sometimes be an important energy source". From: