Company pays $11M for LENR technology

Jan 25, 2014 33 Replies

A North Carolina based company called Industrial Heat LLC has come out and admitted that it now owns Andrea Rossi?s ecat low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) technology. Industrial Heat has put out a press release in which it confirmed rumors that it had spent $11 million to purchase Rossi?s device.


formatting link



I know, I know, Rossi pulled off another scam.



But I thought you should know about the purchase. Mikek


How is it possible that the greatest invention since the beginning of time that will solve all the worlds energy problems and eliminate global warming can be purchased for pocket change $11 mil??????

I wondered that myself, but there are at least two other companies doing LENR.

Well, the answer should be quite obvious. Also, see if you can find Mr. Rossi. I think he is going to get VERY hard to find all of a sudden. I'm sure he's opened a Swiss bank account.

Jon

Oh, so _that's_ how to make money from a Hendershot generator!

Tim Wescott Control system and signal processing consulting www.wescottdesign.com

I think it has to do with fools and signing authority.

Tim Wescott Control system and signal processing consulting www.wescottdesign.com

I'd have offered him ten times as much - to be paid out of the profits when the device goes on sale.

Sylvia.

How about 100x that much, being paid out of the savings that the units produce after they're installed?

I was approached by a solar dealer who would rent me the panels based on some projected savings and some utility power buyback...my electricity would be free. He wasn't the slightest bit interested in payment based on the actual savings.

Certainly one would have to be concerned about the profits coming from scamming consumers. However, while there are power saving scam devices, I strongly doubt they produce incomes at this kind of level. I was assuming that there would only be profits if the thing actually works.

If Rossi believes that it does (I'm doubtful) he'd jump at the extra $99million.

Sylvia.

Well, you don't know if it actually works until it's placed into production. That's why I suggested the payments being made from the savings. Of course a scammer won't go there.

We have a winner! ;-)

Though, in my scenario it would be 1,090M - still a good deal.

lear

e

I'm sure he would be interested assuming you made a down payment of $11M to do the installation

Even legit projects require capital

-Lasse

Disagree. Rossi has built prototypes. Determining if it works is trivial. Bring it over to my garage. We weigh it. We use my meter to measure input energy. We measure output energy...maybe by boiling water. Doesn't have to be a precise measurement, because the gain is extraordinary.

While we wait for the excess energy to count up, we agree on a reference standard. Calculate the most energy we can get out known materials by known methods given input mass equal to the mass of the Rossi apparatus.

When the Rossi excess energy output exceeds the reference value by 10x or so, we proceed to the next step. We have to consider the cost to build the device and the consumables. That would require some insight into what's inside the box. I don't think that will be a problem, cause we won't ever get to that point.

Yes, they require capital, but it gets spent on R&D and getting the thing into production. It doesn't need to be given to the inventor.

There might be a few people out there who gain pleasure from duping companies into pointless expenditure of large amounts of money, but who do not expect any personal benefit. There might be. I doubt Rossi is one.

Sylvia.

Assuming pigs can't fly, he got $11M more than it's real worth

For a good time: install ntp --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

ISTR the report of 6x excess energy. I found this report of the tests,

formatting link
it has COP of 5.6 + or - 0.8.

"JT Vaughn ( snipped-for-privacy@industrialheat.co), who manages Industrial Heat, said that the company acquired the intellectual property and licensing rights to LENR device >AFTER< an independent committee of European scientists conducted two multi-day tests at Rossi?s facilities in Italy. In addition, performance validation tests were conducted in the presence of IH personnel and certified by an independent expert."

Part of the problem they're not sure how it works, Window-Larson theory is one popular theory. How about the transmutation, nickel to copper. :-) Mikek

I know you *REALLY* want to believe in this crap, but it is without any shadow of a doubt pure unadulterated bullshit on a monumental scale. Anyone who buys into this junk "science" and fake engineering that exploits weaknesses in how power is measured deserves what they get.

Still $11M for the worthless IPR isn't such a bad deal for the vendor. Too bad for the company that bought it though :(

Regards, Martin Brown

Widom-Larsen and to be honest "Star Trek Physics" makes more sense. The diagrams and text look like something from a Marvell comic book and output of a text based gibberish generator respectively.

formatting link

Blogs are full of this junk - here is a slightly more trustworthy source

formatting link

That would be rather endothermic as copper isotopes are all heavier than nickel by 0.002-0.009 amu.

Nickel isotopes are

58Ni 28 30 57.9353429(7) Observationally Stable[n 3] 0+ 0.680769(89)

?+ (1.5x10-5%)[6]

60Ni 28 32 59.9307864(7) Stable 0+ 0.262231(77) 61Ni 28 33 60.9310560(7) Stable 3/2- 0.011399(6) 62Ni[n 4] 28 34 61.9283451(6) Stable 0+ 0.036345(17) 63Ni 28 35 62.9296694(6) 100.1(20) a ?- 63Cu 1/2-

64Ni 28 36 63.9279660(7) Stable 0+ 0.009256(9)

Copper isotopes

58Cu 29 29 57.9445385(17) 3.204(7) s ?+ 58Ni 1+ 59Cu 29 30 58.9394980(8) 81.5(5) s ?+ 59Ni 3/2- 60Cu 29 31 59.9373650(18) 23.7(4) min ?+ 60Ni 2+ 61Cu 29 32 60.9334578(11) 3.333(5) h ?+ 61Ni 3/2-

62Cu 29 33 61.932584(4) 9.673(8) min ?+ 62Ni 1+

63Cu 29 34 62.9295975(6) Stable 3/2- 0.6915(15) 0.68983-0.69338 64Cu 29 35 63.9297642(6) 12.700(2) h ?+ (61%) 64Ni 1+ ?- (39%) 64Zn 65Cu 29 36 64.9277895(7) Stable 3/2- 0.3085(15) 0.30662-0.31017 66Cu 29 37 65.9288688(7) 5.120(14) min ?- 66Zn 1+

Perhaps is it catalysed by prayer. It only seems ever to work when it is demonstrated to sycophants, fellow travellers and believers in LENR.

Regards, Martin Brown

It's not so trivial. Remember CNF? It took some time to get to the bottom of that steaming pile. Believers are still around (with their tales of 100MPG carbs).

Are you a calorimetry expert?

Wouldn't one of those steps, before commercial installations, be to explain how it works?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required