Yes, but then you only know for that batch. If the manufactor changes the process, or the process slides still constrained inside datasheet absolute maximum limits, then you can have a problem if you rely on measurements
Granted, the performance of a product can be a lot better if you push the limits like you described
Cheers
Klaus
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
Another good N-channel MOSFET that I have been using lately is the...
R
Robert Baer
AFAIK the "standard" AKA "common" rating is +/-15V and the +/-20V findable after some search.
P
Phil Hobbs
You have to be a bird dog about their process changes, though, which is a pain. For cheap stuff, buying a couple of reels and sticking them in a nitrogen box is good medicine.
You're so right about that, except if you rely on it. Murphy's law applies to Murphy's law as well.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
(I never metamurphy I didn't like.)
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
J
John Larkin
In engineering and sports and finance, extreme performance necessitates risk. Semiconductors seem to be very consistant over time, unless they are from someone like Maxim or Minicircuits that farms out their fabs to various vendors.
Yes, and it has to be done very carefully. Testing to destruction is important, and fun too.
formatting link
That series of tests evaluated switchmode-specified fets way out in their linear-mode SOAR, and involved shrapnel.
Sometimes data sheets are simply missing important specs, and if you want to use the part, you have to characterize them yourself, and take as much risk as is worth it. The specs of RF parts are usually awful, missing basic stuff like DC curves. RF is more like plumbing than electrical engineering; pump something in and see what pours out.
Mosfet switching time specs are often 10x what you can get in real life.
K
krw
That makes sense. I'll not go past absolutes (and design to min/max, where possible) because the risk is too high, margins are too low, and the payoff isn't there.
D
dagmargoodboat
De nada sir, I just happened to have a starting point on my hard drive.
That's the magic of s.e.d., the "collective wisdom." Many individuals together can know and discover more than any one of them can separately.
Cheers, James Arthur
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.