I get a report from SS yearly showing what I have paid in, with an estimate of what my monthly benefit would be if I retired at 62, 65, and 70 yrs old. I would be surprised if you don't get the same.
I would be very surprised if anyone got back their money in two years.
There are two ways to think about the contributions to SS; the money you pay in, and the money your employer pays in. Some would say it is all your money, because of the financial problems with SS and the need for cutbacks, I am willing to say, credit me with what I paid in and start the cutbacks with employer money. If that argument can be made convincingly the cutbacks may be easier politically.
10 time is way to high. I agree, at some point it becomes welfare.
I think that is really stretching things.
That is true of unemployment insurance premiums, (there may be a difference between firings and layoffs) Social security is fixed at 6.2%, for now.
I have calculated my numbers. If I retire at 62, I will get both halves of the payments back in 8.7 years. If I retire at 65 it will take 7.1 years. Actuarial tables say on average I will live till I'm 80, so I'll collect for 18 yrs or 15 yrs, depending on when I retire. These numbers use the estimates on my Social Security Statement. If I retire at 65 I expect to have paid in $138,000 by me and my employer. I would consider myself to have a lower middle class income. I don't know how lifetime earnings affect time to recoup, doesn't seem like it should matter. Don't forget there should be some interest earned on the money beginning in the early seventies.
Mikek