Hi:
Below is an example of "parallel Hz"
If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz.
The benefit of using a billion 1 Hz clock signals to make a clock rate of 1Ghz is that such a system would not get as hot as system running one 1 GHz clock signal . While the overall amount of heat generated by both systems maybe around the same, the system running a billion 1 Hz clock signals will have less heat per area than the system running one
1 billion Hz clock signal. Hence, the former system is far less vulnerable to thermal damage than the latter.Let's say two CPUs of different frequencies have been running at the same voltages and amperages and for the same amount of time. The CPU with a higher-frequency will be hotter than the CPU with a lower- frequency.
In a "parallel Hz" device the bits maybe completely in serial and the algorithms and tasks maybe totally non-parallelizable. However, the frequency is still parallel.
The device I am proposing is completely serial except for the clock rate.
My proposed device is completely serial except for the frequency. It uses "parallel Hz" but in terms of everything other than frequency, it is totally serial and non-parallel. Only the clock rate is parallel.
Parallel Hz = a method using N number of 1 Hz clock signals to gain a clock rate of N Hz.
My design has a clock rate of 4 GHz that is obtained by using 4 billion 1 Hz clock signals. But otherwise, it is completely serial.
This design would go great for any application that cannot be efficiently parallelized [in terms of bits]. Examples of such are arithmetics and Boolean logic. Parallel Hz would work for serial-only problems because the bits are still in serial. Parallel Hz does not require that the bits be parallel.
There is a significant difference between "parallel Hz" and "parallel bits".
A parallel printer is an example of a device that uses "parallel bits". This has nothing to do with "parallel Hz" because both serial and parallel devices can use parallel Hz.
Thanks,
Radium