Help Question: Electronic stethoscope danger

Sep 06, 2008 12 Replies

Hello...a quick question looking for a good suggestion/solution/answer,


1) I have a small rural nursing school;
2) I have a $500 electronic stethoscope (micro-battery powered) that can hear/play/record sounds using an I-Pod by using a direct wire/plug into the I-Pod external microphone jack;
3) I-Pod sounds are very weak and you have to be within inches to hear the sound during playback;
4) I need a room full of 10 students to hear the sounds from the stethoscope;
5) I connected it to a wall-plug store-bought powered I-Pod speaker sound system and it worked great...everybody in room could hear the sounds fine!;
6) Was then informed it could possibly be a major shock hazard (110 power from wall through speakers to stethoscope to person wearing (ear pieces) and to patient's chest (diaphragm);
7) So...now I'm back to Step 1 & 2...

Any suggestions on how I could truly prevent a surge danger for under $100 bucks so that I can safely use the stethoscope and the powered speaker system? Would an automotive quick-jump power pack with 110 inverter work or would the danger still be present? Is there really even a danger in the first place?



Thank you very much for your wisdom, advice and expertise!



William in Colorado



sound

system

OK, that's a solution. But don't most of those systems also have a battery option?

Most hospitals have a staff who are trained to test and evaluate these types of devices. I assume these use a wall-wart, right? Does the wall-wart have a *real* UL label? (not a fake one!)

bucks

Don't do this... Trust me, don't even go there. There are so many better ways that will work well, that this is not practical in any way or shape.

Possibly, especially if you are using stuff from teh likes of WallyWorld...

Find battery powered speakers. There are thousands of examples, and you should have no problems finding them.

bucks

Don't use the wired speakers. You're correct that they may constitute a shock hazard.

There are various wireless adapters for the iPod.

The iPod transmits the audio to a common FM receiver. The wireless provides the necessary isolation. Note that the various models are specific to whichever model iPod you're using. It appears that the transmitter covers up the microphone hole, so you may need to play with some adapters. Worst case, you can use the iPod as a recorder with the microphone attached, and then plug in the FM transmitter when playing back the recording.

Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

In actuality...all the I-Pod does is play/record sound (and not very well due to the frequency/tones of heartbeat & pulse)...so...the digital stethoscope is self amplified and could operate without the I-Pod if I had a battery powered stand alone speaker system I could plug into directly with the scope...or as you suggested (great idea), a wireless transmitter that could then relay the signal to a good powerful receiver. Any suggestions (brand/model) along either line?

Thanks again for this assistance!

William

:Hello...a quick question looking for a good suggestion/solution/answer, : :1) I have a small rural nursing school; :2) I have a $500 electronic stethoscope (micro-battery powered) that can :hear/play/record sounds using an I-Pod by using a direct wire/plug into the :I-Pod external microphone jack; :3) I-Pod sounds are very weak and you have to be within inches to hear the sound :during playback; :4) I need a room full of 10 students to hear the sounds from the stethoscope; :5) I connected it to a wall-plug store-bought powered I-Pod speaker sound system :and it worked great...everybody in room could hear the sounds fine!; :6) Was then informed it could possibly be a major shock hazard (110 power from :wall through speakers to stethoscope to person wearing (ear pieces) and to :patient's chest (diaphragm); :7) So...now I'm back to Step 1 & 2... : :Any suggestions on how I could truly prevent a surge danger for under $100 bucks :so that I can safely use the stethoscope and the powered speaker system? :Would an automotive quick-jump power pack with 110 inverter work or would the :danger still be present? Is there really even a danger in the first place? : :Thank you very much for your wisdom, advice and expertise! : :William in Colorado

You could buy a medical grade 120V/120V isolation transformer to power your speakers from but that will still be fairly expensive but you will probably have to sort out the socket outlet for the plug-pack. You would still have the problem that somebody could unwittingly operate the system without using the transformer. Not a problem if you are the only one looking after and using the equipment.

Ideally, you need equipment suitable for a teaching environment. eg.

formatting link

If the cost seems high then you will at least be supremely confident that nobody will have their safety threatened, and that can save a lot of worry about lawsuits.

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:00:19 GMT, Ross Herbert wrote: : :You could buy a medical grade 120V/120V isolation transformer to power your :speakers from but that will still be fairly expensive but you will probably have to sort out the socket outlet for the plug-pack.

Some transformers come complete with enclosure - ready to go.

formatting link

Just isolate the patient electro-mechanically from the stethoscope by placing the probe in a Plastic Baggie. The probe is most likely Plastic or Bakelite with a plastic or rubber hose anyway, A thin layer of plastic sheeting will not affect the acoustics !

Yukio YANO

Let's say you were the patient... Would you wnat your life to depend on a plastic baggie? I don't think so.

The correct solutions (either battery operated, or proper medical device) has been given.

Surgeons have been doing this for generations, only they call them surgical gloves !

Standard, "conventional" stethoscopes were always electrically isolated from the probe tip by rubber tubing .

If it was in the middle of a epidemic I would insist that a NEW baggie be placed on the Probe Tip .

Where are you going to find and afford this Medical device !

Yukio YANO

Ross...good idea but not an option because we want the sound heard by all...approximately 15 people at a time. We already have and use dual & triple stethoscopes but they mean the task has to be repeated over and over whereas if we could just broadcast for all to hear at once...presto!

William

Yukio...with our electronic digital stethoscope, the microbattery & cpu unit is actually in the diagphram head...in short, the stethoscope head is the brains. It still uses the rubber-like tubing to the ear pieces so the danger is not the person wearing it...but the person whom the stethoscope is placed against & being listening to.

William

:Ross...good idea but not an option because we want the sound heard by :all...approximately 15 people at a time. We already have and use dual & triple :stethoscopes but they mean the task has to be repeated over and over whereas if :we could just broadcast for all to hear at once...presto! : :William I see. Looks to me like your best and easiest solution is the medical grade isolation transformer then.

Why not just use active speakers which are powered by batteries?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required