Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary
February 18, 2004, 9:07 am

I am working on an embedded project and I have decided to keep it relatively
generic. I am using gdb and gdbserver with the DDD shell for debugging,
which works pretty well for me, but for writing code the Emacs editor drives
me crazy. It is very classic, neat, clean and simple and most importantly
pretty well integrated with the gcc command line compiler. However,
absolutely no keystrokes besides the regular letters and digits are the
present standard neither in the GUI Linux world nor in the Windows world.
Since I am using both it's a pain in the ..... Whenever I hit the home key
to go to the start of the line it jumps to the start of the file, find is
called search and I haven't found a short cut for it yet and so on and on.
Isn't there are more modern editor available that integrates equally well
with the gcc compiler but still stays neat, clean and simple but STANDARD?
Something like a GUI Emacs.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks,
Jens.
generic. I am using gdb and gdbserver with the DDD shell for debugging,
which works pretty well for me, but for writing code the Emacs editor drives
me crazy. It is very classic, neat, clean and simple and most importantly
pretty well integrated with the gcc command line compiler. However,
absolutely no keystrokes besides the regular letters and digits are the
present standard neither in the GUI Linux world nor in the Windows world.
Since I am using both it's a pain in the ..... Whenever I hit the home key
to go to the start of the line it jumps to the start of the file, find is
called search and I haven't found a short cut for it yet and so on and on.
Isn't there are more modern editor available that integrates equally well
with the gcc compiler but still stays neat, clean and simple but STANDARD?
Something like a GUI Emacs.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks,
Jens.

Re: Emacs alternative

While you might not be able to get a binary package for RH 7.2, why
don't you simply grab the source for Anjuta and build it? In my
experience, 8 out of 10 times, if a binary package isn't built for your
specific system, you can still just build it manually. You can even use
"checkinstall" and it'll even generate an RPM install for you.
Pete
Site Timeline
- » LiLo BOOT argument ???
- — Next thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » Mounting/Wire a MAPBGA
- — Previous thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » Crosscompiling for ARM: reloc type R_ARM_ABS32 is not supported for PIC - ...
- — Newest thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » Israel sees 60% drop in hospitalizations for age 60-plus 3 weeks after 1st shot
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Electronics Design
-
- » browser mischief
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » Raspberry Pi Group
-