Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary
Subject
- Posted on
Discrepancy in CLB Usage Report
- 07-02-2003
- Anand P Paralkar
July 2, 2003, 4:29 pm

Hi,
I am using the following flow:
VHDL - Entry
Synplify Pro - Synthesis
Xilinx Design Manager - Post synthesis, place and route, etc.
The target device is Xilinx Spartan XL - XCS20XL.
I am trying to understand the two summaries:
1. Synthesis Summary
--------------------
Logic Mapping Summary:
FMAPs: 243 of 392 (62%)
HMAPs: 83 of 196 (43%)
Total packed CLBs: 173 of 196 (89%) <-*-*-*-
(Packed CLBs is determined by the larger of three quantities:
Registers / 2, HMAPs, or FMAPs / 2.)
2. Xilinx Design Manager Summary
--------------------------------
Design Summary:
Number of errors: 1
Number of warnings: 6
Number of CLBs: 250 out of 196 127% <-*-*-*-
CLB Flip Flops: 346
CLB Latches: 3
4 input LUTs: 246
3 input LUTs: 230 (147 used as route-throughs)
Number of bonded IOBs: 48 out of 112 42%
IOB Flops: 34
IOB Latches: 0
Number of clock IOB pads: 4 out of 8 50%
Number of TBUFs: 2 out of 448 1%
Number of BUFGLSs: 4 out of 8 50%
32 unrelated functions packed into 31 CLBs.
(12% of the CLBs used are affected.)
Total equivalent gate count for design: 4178
Additional JTAG gate count for IOBs: 2304
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is there a discrepancy between the Number of CLBs reported
by the synthesis tool (173) and the Xilinx design manager (250)?
As you would observe, the design manager reports an error due
to the excess usage of CLBs. As a result the flow does not proceed
to Place and Route etc. Any suggestions?
Thank you for your time.
Thanks,
Anand
I am using the following flow:
VHDL - Entry
Synplify Pro - Synthesis
Xilinx Design Manager - Post synthesis, place and route, etc.
The target device is Xilinx Spartan XL - XCS20XL.
I am trying to understand the two summaries:
1. Synthesis Summary
--------------------
Logic Mapping Summary:
FMAPs: 243 of 392 (62%)
HMAPs: 83 of 196 (43%)
Total packed CLBs: 173 of 196 (89%) <-*-*-*-
(Packed CLBs is determined by the larger of three quantities:
Registers / 2, HMAPs, or FMAPs / 2.)
2. Xilinx Design Manager Summary
--------------------------------
Design Summary:
Number of errors: 1
Number of warnings: 6
Number of CLBs: 250 out of 196 127% <-*-*-*-
CLB Flip Flops: 346
CLB Latches: 3
4 input LUTs: 246
3 input LUTs: 230 (147 used as route-throughs)
Number of bonded IOBs: 48 out of 112 42%
IOB Flops: 34
IOB Latches: 0
Number of clock IOB pads: 4 out of 8 50%
Number of TBUFs: 2 out of 448 1%
Number of BUFGLSs: 4 out of 8 50%
32 unrelated functions packed into 31 CLBs.
(12% of the CLBs used are affected.)
Total equivalent gate count for design: 4178
Additional JTAG gate count for IOBs: 2304
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is there a discrepancy between the Number of CLBs reported
by the synthesis tool (173) and the Xilinx design manager (250)?
As you would observe, the design manager reports an error due
to the excess usage of CLBs. As a result the flow does not proceed
to Place and Route etc. Any suggestions?
Thank you for your time.
Thanks,
Anand

Re: Discrepancy in CLB Usage Report
3 input LUTs: 230 (147 used as route-throughs)
230 - 147 = 83 = HMAPS reported by Synplify Pro.
You can go into FPGA editor and see what the configuration is for
some of these route throughs.
Anand P Paralkar wrote:

Site Timeline
- » Re: How to get 27MHz from 10 MHz in FPGA???
- — Next thread in » Field-Programmable Gate Arrays
-
- » Re: Does anyone know about hardware implementaions of the SVD ?
- — Previous thread in » Field-Programmable Gate Arrays
-
- » Division Algorithms
- — Newest thread in » Field-Programmable Gate Arrays
-
- » Re: Capacitors at RF
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Electronics Repair
-