Neil Glenn Jacobson wrote: ... : > Ok, it's the MainWin porting tool that requires the per-seat license. : > That's pretty much what keep Xilinx from having a set of free tools for : > Linux, correct? : > : Well, we don't use MainWin but, yes, that is correct.
I don't understand that answer.
Ise 6.2 clearly uses MainWin, or am I wrong?
Yes, you are wrong. Xilinx does not use MainWin
Hmmmm.... What other choices still exist which require a per-seat license?
Phil
Neil Glenn Jacobson wrote: : Uwe Bonnes wrote: : > Neil Glenn Jacobson wrote: : > ... : > : > Ok, it's the MainWin porting tool that requires the per-seat license. : > : > That's pretty much what keep Xilinx from having a set of free tools for : > : > Linux, correct? : > : > : > : Well, we don't use MainWin but, yes, that is correct. : > : > I don't understand that answer. : > : > Ise 6.2 clearly uses MainWin, or am I wrong?
: Yes, you are wrong. Xilinx does not use MainWin
So where do the Wind/U related messages come from that Stephen Williams reports about in the thread "Impact vs. Linux RedHat Linux"
Or is Wind/U something different then MainWin. In that case, excuse my ignorance.
B.t.w.: Does Wind'U require a per seat license?
Bye
Not even close.
The Software contains copyrighted material, trade secrets, and other proprietary information. In order to protect them you may not decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce the Software to a human-perceivable form. You agree not for any purpose to attempt to view or display the Software's object code on any computer screen or otherwise make copy of the Software code. You may not publish data information that compares performance with created distributed by others
- a
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required