1. Home
  2. Embedded Programming
  3. Extra port?

Extra port?

Hi,

I am using an Atmel AT91RM9200 (ARM9) processor which has a single MAC built-in. I also have software drivers which support Ethernet through this MAC. I have a reference design which uses the RMII interface to a PHY chip (Davicom DM9161). So far so good.

However, I want to be able to change the reference design so that I can simultaneously attach two 10/100Base-T devices to this single MAC without having to change the software driver (just as if the reference design board has had its cable connected to an external hub).

I have seen some chips which have repeater functionality as well as RMII interfaces. Is it as simple as just using one of these chips (ie the RMII talks to one of the PHYs on the chip and then that PHY connects in a hub-like way to the other PHYs on the chip), and then bring out two of the other PHY connections to RJ45 connectors?

Thanks in advance for any help.

Reply to
paul.cabble
Loading thread data ...

Cirrus KS8993 (3 port) or KS8995 (5 port). You'll need SPI (bitbanged is fine) to set them up.

Paul Burke

Reply to
Paul Burke

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your rapid response. I found the Micrel KS8993 (is this the one you meant?), but I was hoping for something with the RMII interface as I don't have access to the full MII interface.

Anyway, I think you are telling me that it really is as simple as just using such a chip to do what I want, right?

Regards, Paul.

Reply to
pingSmith

Has some other greedy bugger used up all the pins then? The !!MICREL not cirrus!! KS8993/5 use the full MII. But the AMD Am79C875 seems to have RMII.

Yes, just drop the appropriate device in. Then spend 6 weeks making it work, because the data sheet gets very vague at times, at least Micrel's did. It was actually very easy once I knew how, and it's amazing what it will let you get away with (*). I was expecting layout etc. to be totally critical, but it seemed to forgive my sins in a most indulgent manner. Also, having automatic crossover detect, I didn't have to be too worried about whether transmit means receive, as long as I got the true and inverse right.

Paul Burke

  • like forgetting to put termination networks on the (discrete) transformers.
Reply to
Paul Burke

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your further information. I can well believe the 6 weeks you mentioned. I had a nightmare getting a quad UART working on the platform (linux driver/interrupt problems). It's nice to know that the layout isn't all that critical.

I must admit, though - I am the greedy bugger who used the other port lines of the MII .

Thanks again for your help.

Regards, Paul.

Reply to
pingSmith

These chips basically have one RMII interface per channel, but the AT91RM9200 has only one and only one MAC so this won't work. You need a MAC and PHYSICAL chip that sits on the processor bus. A 10/100 version of the cirrus CS8900.

Reply to
sjones

Hi sjo,

Thanks for your input on this.

Regards, Paul.

Reply to
pingSmith

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.