5Vdc from 48Vdc - Options?

The cyclinders in which the plugs are situated are in different phases of the ignition cycle. One will on the compression pahse, ready to ignite with a high breakdown voltage (about 10kv) due to the (approximate) 10 atmospheres pressure and the other will be in an exhaust phase with a relatively low pressure and thus a low breakdown voltage(about 1kv). The bodies of the plug (ground electrode) are joined by the metallic engine block. The secondary of the ignition coil has 2 terminals, one from each end of its coil. One goes to the hot terminal of plug A, the other to the hot terminal of plug B. The current flows from coil through 'A' to ground to 'B' back to coil. NOTE: There is no distriutor in this arrangement. That is the whole point.

Reply to
Rocky
Loading thread data ...

Yes, (I did see the smiley) but a 4 cycle engine take 720deg per full circle so a spark every 360 degrees is necessary for each pair of cylinders in a convetional inline 2 or 4 cylinder layout.

Reply to
Rocky

Yes, I figured that out about 5 minutes after I posted, and realized that it wasn't a typo.

--
ArarghMail904 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.
Reply to
ArarghMail904NOSPAM

snipped-for-privacy@NOT.AT.Arargh.com escribió:

In other words, a 4 cycle engine has spin 1/2. (Sorry, I couldn't resist it)

Reply to
Ignacio G.T.

Let me draw you a picture so we both understand what the other is talking about...

formatting link

Reply to
Jim Stewart

t

Do you understand the mechanism that causes the breakdown voltage to increase when the gases are compressed? I suppose that in the presence of the electric field each molecule forms a dipole reducing the field locally. With more molecules in the path of the electric field, it might be that each molecule sees a smaller electric field, but I can't say that for certain since I expect the applied field to be much larger than the local fields. But I guess it is reasonable that the molecules are close enough together that the local fields nearly cancel the applied field.

Sounds good, but is that how it works?

Rick

Reply to
rickman

t -

I like the gudgeon (wrist) pin.

Reply to
Rocky

formatting link

Apparently this can cause major problems a high altitude. Some equipment is rated for maximum altitude operation based on potential of arcing taking place with the consequential damage to electrodes as well as issues with depostion of metal vapour on circuitry.

Reply to
Rocky

My wild-ass guess would be that since the mean free path decreases, it would take more energy to blast an electron through.

Reply to
Jim Stewart

s

Thanks for the link. But that didn't really explain much. It gave a formula and sort of waved hands over the term "secondary emission".

Rick

Reply to
rickman

at

t

Ok, I won't say that isn't on target, but what exactly is mean free path? Is that the average distance an electron travels without hitting something? I would expect that *not* to be important in this case. Mean free path would affect the speed of electron motion, but how would it affect the breakdown voltage?

I suppose it might determine the average energy of a collision and therefor the likelihood of a secondary electron emission? That might make some sense.

Rick

Reply to
rickman

You didn't run a speel chick on that diagrim, didja? It's "dissipated", not "dissapated".

;)

Sorry, couldn't resist. I'm a grumpy old geek too.

I *love* this newsgroup ;). Despite farting around with ignition systems (mechanical vs. electronic) on British bikes (BSA, AJS, Triumph, mostly singles and twins) [1] far too many years ago to admit to, I'm finding this diversion utterly fascinating ;). And finding I know nuffink, which is not unusual ;).

[1] Had a 4-cylinder Honda while living in the US some years later. Let the specialists retune it every time the weather changed.... I now drive a Volvo with fuel injection and a 'puter to do all that stuff...

Steve

--

formatting link

Reply to
Steve at fivetrees

... snip ...

If your statement about impedance vs pressure is accurate, that has to be the mechanism. I don't know. If the relationship is opposite, the plugs have to be wired in parallel, and again only the appropriate one will go off.

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: 
            Try the download section.
Reply to
CBFalconer

... snip ...

I've graduated through several Austins, Hillmans, Volvos, VWs, Mitsubishis, Subarus, Hondas to a Ford (Escort). I don't count the GM machines, which were disasters. I no longer ride, but all my bikes had magneto ignition (including a Douglas and a BMW). My wife got a Honda with electric starter and a coil. (Look up the Douglas - great bike except the Lucas electrics).

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: 
            Try the download section.
Reply to
CBFalconer

Even if the compressed air-fuel mixture has a lower breakdown voltage, they plugs do not have to be wired in parallel. I just can't see putting plugs in parallel because of potential problems causing two plugs to misfire rather than just one. In that situation I expect they would add a center tap to the coil and in essence treat the coil as two coils that fire from the same control.

Rick

Reply to
rickman

I belong to a model engine builders club...

formatting link

And we have had builders try to run 2 plugs in parallel. It doesn't work, the exhaust plug breaks down and fires first, hogging all the current.

OTOH, my Subaru works just fine wired as I illustrated.

Two weekends ago a member showed us his ignition test stand. He had a small chamber for a spark plug that he could pressurize with air to simulate the required breakdown conditions inside an engine.

Reply to
Jim Stewart

Here is some meat...

formatting link

Reply to
Jim Stewart

:
s

ns

on

ave

t
e

That is an interesting curve. Is the curve truly only dependent on the product of pressure and gap distance? I would expect the point of the curve to be sensitive to the pressure, but less so to the gap distance. The knee being at a certain pressure, gap product value says to me that the knee is produced by a certain number of molecules being in the gap regardless of the distance.

Of course, I don't really understand the mechanism, so I guess I shouldn't expect much...

Rick

Reply to
rickman

Allright. I'm convinced.

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: 
            Try the download section.
Reply to
CBFalconer

I was going to mention the curve as well, but its old and very incomplete and I'm honestly out of my depth on fuller aspects of this subject and figured I'd better let someone else discuss it.

I do know, because I've had email exchanges a few years ago with one of the few experts around on the subject, that plasma descriptions require at least two spatial and one time dimension of PDEs, coupled to at least 6-dim ODEs in order to apprehend with modern accuracy. Plus radiation transport and atomic interactions, which complicate things further. I'm told you can do a fair amount with global rate equations which assume spatially averaged densities for the charged particles and neutral atoms and molecules, excited and metastable states. He added that there is an intermediate text by Lieberman and Lichtenberg, called "Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing," out of John Wiley and Sons, which does a good treatment of the fundamentals of discharges, collisions, DC and RF discharges.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Kirwan

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.