The difficulty is understanding just what Don was getting at. His first post in its entirety was:
--------------------------------
Total and utter horseshit.
"DC" is simply the first (or "offset" term in the Fourier expression of any repetitive waveform.
"AC" are all of the remaining components.
Changing the relative amplitude of the terms does NOT in any manner change which is the first term and which are the remaining terms.
DC, of course, cannot exist at all ever. Because it would have to be unvarying through infinite time.
Tutorials on my website.
---------------------------------
--------------------------------- "AC" or "DC" are gross and meaningless oversimplifications.
---------------------------------
If he thinks "AC" and "DC" are gross and meaningless oversimplifications, why would he offer alternative definitions of AC and DC to those given by Penoyer which Don thinks are "Total and utter horseshit"? Why offer definitions of AC and DC at all if he thinks so poorly of the terms? Because when people see him first disparaging someone else's definitions and then offering definitions of his own, they're going to think he believes his own definitions are good ones.