Why would anyone buy an e-reader? (2023 Update)

Like Amazon Kindle reader? Unless you have really sensitive eyes, read all the time and need that anti-glare feature. They seem to lack internet connectivity, such as allowing a google search of something in the text as you're reading, which I take to be a real limitation. Battery longevity feature is nice but who really needs it.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs
Loading thread data ...

I'd not *buy* one buy have rescued several. I actually find them preferable to paperbacks (as in sci-fi, fiction, etc. -- stuff without illustrations).

It's nice to be able to hold a library in your hand -- instead of boxes full of paperbacks. Put a 32G microSD card in the thing and you'll quickly discover how *small* most books really are!

It's got a nice "heft" to it.

It's nice to be able to read in a darkened room.

It's nice to just turn it off and know your place is marked for the next time you turn it on. No dog-eared pages!

It's nice to be able to adjust the size of the text and having it reflow to fit the physical display.

(The built-in dictionary is sort of a waste -- esp for fiction, etc.)

The "file system" (if you want to call it that) is the biggest problem. It wants to display covers of books as if in a bookstore. This limits how many titles can be displayed on the screen, at a time. I want to be able to just browse for (book,author) and could give a rats ass about what the cover looks like!

The built-in Sudoku and crossword puzzle are nice diversions -- though once you've done all of the stored crosswords, it's sort of a wasted feature!

I've never used the media player feature. Nor the built-in apps like Pandora. But, they're hard-wired into the device.

There are some bugs (particularly in the "games") but they are tolerable.

Battery life is helpful as it's a PITA to recharge most electronic devices (finding the right cord, finding a place to park the device while it is being charged, etc.).

SWMBO uses a larger version of these things as its easier on her eyes (one drawback of changing typeface size is it reduces the amount of text on a page).

I'd not buy one of the "epaper" devices. The displays "feel" funny (esp during refresh).

One could buy a real tablet and install software to provide these functionalities -- as well as having avenues to expand (e.g., your on-line issue). But, then you have to manage software in addition to "content".

Reply to
Don Y

For the record, I have Nooks, not the Amazon (or Sony, etc.) products.

Reply to
Don Y

Don Y snipped-for-privacy@foo.invalid wrote in news:si4o35$fuq$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

iPad Pro 12" Is the perfect carry along device. Especially if one gets the keyboard and pencil (that is the most expensive pencil ever).

But the kindle is also daylight readable, so the lady on the beach can still read it.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

I use the Sony Clie PalmOS PDA as an "e-reader" back around 2005, it was monochrome with an EL backlit display I believe, even in a dark room it didn't seem to cause much eyestrain. Supported up to 256MB Sony MemorySticks and could store a lot of books on that.

Got the better part of 12 hours of battery life IIRC even with the backlight running, off two AAA batteries:

formatting link
Reply to
bitrex

Remember the Barns & Noble Nook?

formatting link

I had one around 2010, basically a customized Android tablet, I remember the 800 MHz Cortex A8 was some slow-ass garbage in that application.

Reply to
bitrex

I can recommend you an Boox Note Air.

I bought mine especially with electronik-engineer-use in mind.

It is an ereader that is good for any kind of PDFs/Datasheet/schematic. You can write in the books in the same speed than writing with a pencil on paper. You can export anything as new pdf. It easy to use your private NAS for data exchange. No server somewhere in the world!

It has a very fast android system with a VERY long battery lifetime because of eink.

The new eink is fast enought that you even can view grayscaled Youtube video with some minor cutbacks in quality.

The software feels good! In these day a seldom point!

Very good for left-handed geniuses because you can turn it around completly. :)

There is only one draw back. I NEED lt-spice for android. SIGH!

Olaf

Reply to
olaf

That looks very top of the line.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

Thanks for the lowdown. Sounds perfect for an ebook addict.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

Yes, I like Kindle readers. I have 3 e-ink tablet readers[1]. The 2 that I use the most are Kindle DX Graphite 9.7" 3G:

formatting link
formatting link
Before each project, I load it with PDF's of documents and drawings that I might want. Mostly data sheets, bids, proposals, forms, applications, correspondence, etc. 128MB of RAM is rather tight, but I manage. The main advantages are instant on, bit screen, and I can read it outdoors, in bright sunlight. For managing files, I just plug it into my PC via USB or email documents directly to my Kindle. Free

3G connectivity was nice, but that mostly went away in my area several years ago. The Kindle DX Graphite does not have Wi-Fi.

My Kindles are not ideal but cheap at a thrift shop. They do meet a specific need (as a reader). I would not recommend it for managing my life, text entry, or Google searching. For those, I have a Moto G Power (2020) phone.

Unfortunately, all of my older readers are in need of battery transplants. Seems easy enough, but batteries for the older units are becoming difficult to find:

formatting link
formatting link

[1] I have 6 readers, but 2 have dead batteries and 1 has an intermittent usb connector.
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Apparently the Nook is still very popular. The pandemic caused them to be entirely sold out and no longer available for sale.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

Yes, probably not the cheapest invest. But because of corona we all had not the opportunity to push out the money in extensivly caribbean holiday. :-)

And it is a big improvement that you can now write FAST on the display. I smile every day when I use it.

Check this out:

formatting link
Olaf

Reply to
olaf

On a sunny day (Sat, 18 Sep 2021 05:34:24 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Fred Bloggs snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

I have an e-reader, main buying point was it is water proof and it is readable in direct sunlight. Important point on a saiing boat. But lack of color makes reading some graphs problematic. Not using it much if at all.

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

I fought moving away from dead trees for a very long time; "books should be made of paper".

But, not ALL books *need* to be made of paper! I had 80

10-ream-copy-paper boxes of paperbacks when I moved here. I now have 1 or 2 (the titles that have sentimental value).

For a while, I used a 12" (diagonal) tablet PC for technical documents where the "presentation" is bound to the file format (e.g., PDFs). But, I found that less useful than the ereader -- when I'm reading technical stuff, I tend to also be designing something *with* it so need access to other applications alongside the "reader" (i.e., in a *window*).

But, the ereaders see use EVERY day. They're just *so* convenient (assuming you read a lot). If I have a dentist, doctor, etc. appointment -- where I can expect to be "waiting" for some period of time -- I just grab one as I head out the door. The screens are nice and bright so I can read them outdoors (while taking my evening walk or stopped at a traffic light).

And, I'm pretty quick with sudoku puzzles so a 10 minute wait goes by pretty quickly! Certainly better than reading stale magazines!

Of course, you'd not want to consume "technical material" in those little dribs and drabs where more "focus" is required.

Reply to
Don Y

Yeah, but a tiny screen; all that wasted space on gesture and ebutton input.

SWMBO uses a Nook HD -- which is more like an "adult" novel form factor

formatting link
But, I find it a bit too big for "entertainment" reading -- it's like carrying an iPad around (though has a nicer "heft" to it)

For novels, that's more than two 500pp titles, for me. I'd likely want a break between them -- hence a recharging interval.

(A domestic flight is 500pp, each way. So, I could recharge at my destination and be ready for the next title on my return flight).

Reply to
Don Y

I fully agree. No way am I ever going to give up physical hard-copy. The only time it's a PITA is on flights where bulk and weight can be an issue, but aside from that, I much prefer the feel and smell of a

*real* book. I did look into Kindles and such-like many years ago but the contrast seemed rather poor and batteries run out and whatnot then you're f***ed, so they're a non-starter AFAIC. Maybe one day they'll make one that I'll be tempted to buy, but for now and the foreseeable future, *real* books rule.

--

"There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc., that are common to all states of society. But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion,and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all historical experience."

- The Communist Manifesto, Marx & Engels.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

A couple of other points (which likely don't affect the "average" reader):

- you can search an ebook; a dead tree relies on the quality of its index (and, you can only find things that *have* been indexed -- uncommon in a work of fiction)

- you can search an ebook *collection* for keywords (though not on any of the ereaders I have)

- you can cut/paste from an ebook (though not *on* an ereader)

- you can backup an ebook (space-intensive with dead trees)

*True* PDFs give you most of these capabilities, as well. With different ebook formats, you have to rely on supplemental tools (e.g., on a PC) for some of those activities (e.g., tell me which novel has a character named "Bink")

Think "portability" when it comes to ereaders; *taking* a book (or a library!) with you (on a trip, to an appointment, etc.)

Think "reference" when it comes to PDFs (technical papers, text books, etc.). I.e. once you've exposed yourself to the material, future accesses are likely to be *references*... explicitly looking for something that you recall being present in a text (or *some* text). Search is a real win, there (e.g., recently, I was looking for other papers I'd accumulated that discussed "glottal waveforms". Do you think I'm going to parse thousands of *titles* in the hope that something rings a bell? Or, just search the collection for "glottal waveform"?)

Paper is really only useful for sentimental reasons *or* as a first exposure to some material. E.g., I print every research paper prior to reading it -- then discard (recycle) the pages, once done... relying on the electronic copy as a REFERENCE.

It's been "emotional" discarding some of the classic texts that I'd accumulated. But, having an electronic version accessible ON MY WORKSTATION sure beats having to find desk space for a print book while I'm trying to use material that it exposed! (Do I really *need* Knuth's texts cluttering up shelf space for the "consolation" of being able to crack one open, in my lap, to VISUALLY hunt for some tidbit?? Ditto Stevens? Schneier?)

Reply to
Don Y

They made it years ago, but Cursitor Doom hasn't noticed yet.

One of his reasons for liking real books is that they last, so he can read out-of-date and frequently incorrect information that he happens to like when more modern books tell a story he doesn't find as attractive. He claims to have spent a lot of money on finding out what scientists thought about anthropogenic global warming before they'd got around to collecting any reliable information on the subject. He's very happy with their ludicrous conclusions.

Reply to
Anthony William Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.