Feb 09, 2026 Last reply: 3 months ago 1177 Replies
B
Bill Sloman
John Larkin keeps on making that claim. I'm perfectly well aware that the possessive form of it is "its" and "it's" is a contraction of "it is".
But I'm human and I make errors of action when I'm typing. The most frequent ones are omissions.
The intention was to type "Your English language skills aren't as good as they might be." Sadly, I left out a "y".
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
B
Bill Sloman
If they make a habit getting it wrong, you might be right. You should be well aware that I spell "flatter" correctly most of the time. I do accuse you of being hungry for flattery quite frequently.
If I do start saying nice things about you, watch out - it will probably mean that I could use something you control. It hasn't happened for twenty years now, so it is unlikely.
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
Bill Sloman
- Willy Wonka
He probably didn't mean nonsense about anthopogenic global warming. One long term effect of burning even more fossil carbon as fuel is a catastrophic decline in the human population of the planet.
Now that renewable energy is cheaper than the energy you can get by burning fossil carbon, it is unlikely that we will lose all that many people, but Donald Trump now seems to be angling for the genocide prize.
His incompetence probably doubled the number of Americans who ended up dying of Covid-19, and he's now older and sillier. Chairman Mao is currently still way ahead, but Trump's ill-advised war in the Middle East may not be as easy to stop as he seems to think.
Bill Sloman, Sydney
M
Maciej Woźniak
Sadly you don't have a clue how GPS works, and while I can - and have - pointed you at fairly complete explanations - you are either incapable of following them or unwilling to put in the effort.
Just other words for "I'm too dumb to lie consequently".
More humiliating your defeats - more hatred in your barking, poor stupid scum.
And there are no. If we didn't correct they would happen for real. But we did - so they only exist in sick gedanken delusions of brainwashed idiots like you. Your idiot guru didn't predict corrections. According to his insane mysticism they shouldn't have happened. But they did and blew his idiocies out.
Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of lying s*it as you are can't lie non stop, so sometimes you admit they are.
Of course it needs. Common sense has been warning your idiot guru.
Different from WHAT? From gedanken clocks fabricated by your brainwashed imagination? Welcome to the reality. That's what clocks are. That's how they look like.
Go to a kindergarten, tell the kids the tale of your superhuman mental abilities, they'll probably buy it. Really - you're an arrogant idiot knowing nothing, able to nothing and too dumb even to lie consequently.
>
B
Bill Sloman
" 4 Cs periods more". I wonder what Maciej Woźniak thought that might mean.
If the Cs periods are derived from a Cesium clock
formatting link
that would be a fixed 0.435 psec which sounds odd. He hasn't specified what the "divider" is, or what it is doing. He may have found himself a description of circuits inside the orbiting satellite, but he hasn't posted any kind of link to it.
Granting his capacity to misread perfectly clear text, it's pointless to speculate further. I've used and designed lots of dividers throughout my career, but setting one "to 4 Cs periods more" isn't an action I can recognise.
<snipped the rest>
B
Bill Sloman
It's a joke. If you had any sense you'd have been able to recognise it as such.
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
Bill Sloman
To Maciej Woźniak's complete satisfaction. Every bit of evidence always strikes him as proving him right. His logic is a little hard to follow - as in non-existent - but his conclusions are cast in stone.
M
Maciej Woźniak
It's a dodge. The idiot simply can't answer the question (like yourself) but instead snipping he dodge it with a joke.
If you had any sense you'd have been able to recognise it
M
Maciej Woźniak
Wild assertions of brainwashed religious maniacs. Your idiot guru predicted differences in clock indications. There are no. If we applied your idiocy - they would happen for real and the prophecies of the idiot would be fulfilled. Since your "standard" is unusable for serious measurement (anyone can check GPS)
- its only purpose was trying to enforce these prophecies to happen.
B
Bill Sloman
But you are the kind of kid who thinks that his own mental abilities are superhuman, and won't buy anything he doesn't fancy
There's really no way of avoiding looking arrogant when you are dealing with an ignorant half-wit.
Paying attention to what they are trying to say only pays off if they have some desire to get to be less ignorant,and you are perfectly complacent in your ignorance.
Plonk.
R
Ross Finlayson
Hey, you guys want to get a room or something?
M
Maciej Woźniak
Keep raving and spitting, poor stupid scum, snip questions of how things really are in the reality, die as a brainwashed religious maniac. It won't help your "dilation" delusion. It only exist in a perfect gedanken world where all clock and all observers obey the madness of your idiot guru.
Indeed, that's why I may look like that.
And you definitely don't. Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of lying s*it as you are can't lie non stop, so sometimes you admit GPS clocks are corrected for errors.
,and you are perfectly
J
Jeroen Belleman
[...]
It's called 'parody'. The US definitely comes across as creepy.
Jeroen Belleman
B
Bill Sloman
Far from it."Plonk" is an assertion that I won't bother responding to his posts in future. It means that I won't bother reading them any more either. If he does comes up with assertion that is risible enough to be worth jeering at, I'll only see it if somebody else responds to it, and nobody much does.
There are people on sci.electronics.design that rarely have anything interesting to say and I rarely read their posts. Maciej Woźniak has got there remarkably quickly, and he's unpleasant with it.
M
Maciej Woźniak
I kicked the dumb ass of this lying piece of s*it so hard that it can't stand it anymore. That's all.
J
john larkin
He makes a living out of being, well, what he has become.
The point shouldn't be about how bad people were 80 or 300 years ago. What's important is how much we have improved.
It's wonderful around here. People are nice and friendly and helpful and the weather is beautiful today. And the Canyon Market has a holiday corned-beef reuben today.
The internet isn't much like reality.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
R
Ross Finlayson
Such language is the plebeian patois of poor students and bad kids who never learned their "times tables".
The other usual account of such vainglory is "bull-s*it", the actual loss of a bull of its continence of its bodily functions.
You say there's always a Galilean account for example from the perspective of the moving item itself as as Einstein images "riding the light", fine, it's so, and then about there always being an Euclidean account, yes it's so, then though about the real space-contraction and the arrival times of things, and the elapsed times, somebody with a universal clock hypothesis may say that clocks meet or slow (otherwise constant monotone), as well, there are interpretations where that's so and that's fine.
Here for example is distinguished the linear and the rotational settings and for the space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational and keeping things Galilean as they are in the linear and Euclidean as they are in the linear, all else just be matters of a perspective and projection, as they are, in a theory like "relativity theory" with its one axiom, "motion is relative", everything else basically being a reductionism otherwise from since "motion is absolute", with however it works the space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational, I'll agree that eventually the "space-time" is isotropic, and all the sky survey agrees or the great account of the sky survey, and that automatically means the Euclidean and then as for "apparent super-luminal motion" as well the Galilean, and even in accelerators and cyclotrons, for example about the gyroklystron I was just reading about, the energy put into particles their acceleration really does result their Galilean velocity.
Then, that the theory keeps an account of that as simple for high-school algebra and trig, that's just another way of looking at the same things, and they've made their sand castles and tinker-toys and Rube Goldberg machines and mousetraps, they are what they are and if you want something better then make one.
J
Jeroen Belleman
Ask Iran, or Greenland, Denmark, or Venezuela. Trump is a creep and the US is a rogue, not to be trusted. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
Jeroen Belleman
R
Ross Finlayson
Besides these sorts of accounts being rather matter-of-factly so, I can point you to examples for example from "The Problem Book in Relativity" of problems of derivations of various things like boost addition that see conflicting derivations.
Then for the "energy and configuration of experiment", and "experience and experiment", there are lots of examples in physics like Heaviside's telegrapher's equation (which wasn't wrong and contradicted another seemingly innocuous derivation) or Euler on vibrating strings (which wasn't right), that due simply the "merely partial" account of the usual Lorentzian invariant and being correct "only to first order" for example the most well-known equation in physics the "E = mc^2" actually only being the first term in a numerical approximation for K.E. that not only has infinitely many more terms yet also has that in the dimensional analysis those are out also, or "Einstein's first account of mass-energy equivalency", that not being the usual one given by SR instead GR, that Galilean and Euclidean may be super-imposed on otherwise the matters of projection and perspective that get involved in otherwise super-classical accounts.
Then, it would be a different trappings of the sand castles and tinker-toys and machines and mousetraps, point being though that while it's an "inertial system" the usual account of mechanics, that it's a "differential system" particularly a merely "partial-differential system" means that by definition it's frayed at the edges and not its own "whole cloth".
J
john larkin
Should Israel and the USA respect the soverignity of a place run by murderous thugs, who are building ICBMs and nukes?
The Iranian creeps hates the Jews so much they *would* nuke them when they were able.
And they don't mind machine-gunning crowds of their own people.
Greenland and Denmark are doing OK so far.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.