skiing terminology

Your daughter will no doubt volunteer to show you. :-)

I am impressed with how inexpensively folks like Joerg are getting their cell phone service... I have a "smart" phone that runs Windows Mobile, and I actually use it for Internet browsing, calendar syncing, etc. far more than as a POTS phone... but I'm paying ~$40/mo for the privilege too.

---Joel

Reply to
Joel Koltner
Loading thread data ...

My phone can't do that, it's a basic phone-phone. Ok, it can send and receive very brief emails but that's pretty much it. For Internet I now have a netbook but I am not using a cell carrier network (I think it could), just the usual access spots. I could not bring myself to looking at a datasheet on a 2" by 2.5" screen.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

So, it is then about $6.67 every month for service, and the balance just goes up if you don't use it. I know my phone has a balance of about $50 right now. I don't use it very much, until I go on a business trip, and then use it a lot!

Charlie

Reply to
Charlie E.

Nyuk-nyuk. :-) I've never a cell phone I liked. All of my siblings and their spouses have cells. Different phones, different carriers, in various parts of the U.S. They all make the caller sound like he/she is talking under water.

Remember back in ancient times when Ma Bell crowed about crystal clear, fibre-optic transmission? "You-can-hear-a-pin-drop"...yadda-yadda. That selling point sure went to hell in a handbasket when the cell came along. "Lossy compression" doesn't even begin to describe the awful things that cells do to audio. And the price is ... well, way too much. "Only" fifty bucks per month for cell service. No thanks, I'll stick to land-line at about $25 per month.

Reply to
Michael

their spouses have

They all make the caller

fibre-optic transmission?

in a handbasket when

awful things that cells

month for cell

I've had Verizon ever since it began (actually as a part of Qwest), with my "brick" phone ;-)

If you'll check out the reviews, Verizon is rated BEST for reception quality AND coverage.

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
With all this hope and change, all you need is a dab of mayonaisse
and you\'ll have a tasty lunch on which you will choke to death.
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Oh, that's *you* I always hear at Wal-Mart! ;-) Then please stay out of my favorite store, Barnes & Noble, so I can read my Circuit Cellar in peace.

I am a techno-geek with Lifetime membership. I understand the appeal of neat stuff, and I own tons of it. I do not like cells (for me). If it works for you, stick with it; if it doesn't work for you, shun it.

Reply to
Michael

I *like* that elderly man. :-) And I share his philosophy. I set my found-in-the-trash-and-repaired digital answering machine to pick up on ring #1, keep the ringer on the phone turned OFF. Ans. mach. Volume turned up so that I can hear caller. Family and friends know to holler, "It's me. Pick up.", if it's an emergency, also know to expect me *not* to pick up during either 1) "60 Minutes" or 2) network news.

Reply to
Michael

their spouses have

They all make the caller

fibre-optic transmission?

hell in a handbasket when

awful things that cells

per month for cell

I pay $60/mo for two lines. I was paying $50 each for two lines (one for a modem) so switched to cable for the computer and 2 cell phones for us, and saved significant money. I now have a phone line too (moved) but there isn't even a phone attached to it.

I've only had cell phones for about five years. Coverage is the reason I went with Verizon. Voice quality isn't wonderful, but it's only a phone.

Reply to
krw

on ring #1, keep the

hear caller. Family and

to expect me *not* to

Figures. Another weenie.

Reply to
krw

on ring #1, keep the

caller. Family and

to expect me *not* to

^^^^^^^^^^---- Your lack of class has been defined ;-)

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
With all this hope and change, all you need is a dab of mayonaisse
and you\'ll have a tasty lunch on which you will choke to death.
Reply to
Jim Thompson

It would be more if they were providing you with better voice quality by virtue of using more bandwidth. :-)

Reply to
Joel Koltner

VirginMobile $6.67, PagePlus $2.50

Reply to
Bob Engelhardt

I'd rather sky-dive - 13,000 feet of air with NOTHING TO CRASH INTO! ;-)

Cheers! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Is that one of those $19.00 cheapies that the CSI's call a "burn phone"? ;-)

Thanks, Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

No, it's an LG from Verizon, with zigapixel camera, texting, music player, two lcd's, tons of features that I've turned off.

OK, I do also use it to tell the time.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Sounds like my LG VX9800...

formatting link

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

With the introduction of Obama\'s carbon taxes it is likely that my
annual energy costs will double.  But I\'ll make up that cost by
dismissing my maid, landscape and swimming pool maintenance 
services.  Oh, I forgot the aquarium guy.  I\'ll also stop tipping
when I go out to eat.  But I won\'t worry... Obama will take care
of all those folks.  They probably voted Democrat anyway ;-)
Reply to
Jim Thompson

I tried that, a class and a couple of static jumps. Blew both my ankles to bits on the second jump... had to crawl to the bathroom for a week afterwards.

The thing I noticed was the absurd duty cycle: hours of prep, packing chutes, suiting up, hanging around under a shade tree drinking beer, waiting for the plane, gaining altitude, all that for a few minutes of air time per day.

You can ski all day if you have the stamina. And it's absorbing, unlike something passive like lying on a beach. I always bring work up with me, and never touch it. Ski, eat, sleep, ****.

But what do you mean by NOTHING TO CRASH INTO? What about trees, water, rocks, and the Planet Earth?

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Nah, that's after the good part, i.e., freefall. When you get too low, and have to pull, then there's nothing but that boring parachute ride to ground. And you're supposed to know how to steer into the middle of a field. (i.e., away from water, power lines, trees, sewage plants*, etc.) Then the 'chute gently lowers you to the ground at ~16 ft/sec. ;-)

Cheers! Rich

*The DZ (drop zone) at Baldwin, Wisc. has a sewage plant right at the southeast corner of the field, which the skydivers refer to as "the Turd Swirl". They say that if both of your 'chutes fail, to aim for it for a soft landing. ;-)
Reply to
Rich Grise

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.