Sampler diodes with more barrier height?

Folks,

After John Larkin sent me SMS7621 Schottky RF diodes I played around with them in the lab. While they perform nicely at room temperature everything goes to pots at a slightly elevated temperature. At ballpark

50C the leakage current is already painfully high for use as a sampler diode.

Question: Is there a fast RF diode or sampling diode in a reasonable cost range (low single-digit Dollars) with more barrier height? In samplers one doesn't care so much about Vf but unfortunately many such diodes are marketed as RF detectors where Vf does matter. I guess that's why they leak so much when the temps go up.

--
Regards, Joerg 

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg
Loading thread data ...

I was browsing schottkies the other day and came across BAR18, highish voltage (70V), CJO max 2pF, stupidly high Vf (2V at only 40mA!). How much leakage and CJO do you require?

Tim

-- Seven Transistor Labs Electrical Engineering Consultation Website:

formatting link

Reply to
Tim Williams

That's too big a diode, I need

Reply to
Joerg

BZX84C75 ?

Cheers

--
Syd
Reply to
Syd Rumpo

Joke?

Cheers, Jeroen Belleman

Reply to
jeroen Belleman

The classic 2-diode feedback sampler doesn't much care about leakage. Within about a microsecond after the sampling pulse, the delta-v glitch is amplified in a charge amp, usually back up to 100% sampling efficiency, and dumped into a slow s/h. That voltage, with the diode back-biases, is applied back onto the diodes for the next shot. That makes the overall sampling process ultra-linear and allows it to work down to very low trigger rates.

There are higher-barrier diodes in the Skyworks family. They have a great sample kit.

What sort of risetime did you get? Are you doing an open-loop sampler? What the sampling pulse generator like?

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation
Reply to
John Larkin

Am 15.02.2014 22:54, schrieb Joerg:

Sth. with a larger band gap like GaAs? Abuse a MGF1302 gate that you may have in your junk box?

regards, Gerhard

Reply to
Gerhard Hoffmann

If push comes to shove I'll have to use a 2-diode sampler and figure out a balun for driving. I could also use a follow-up S&H on my single-diode sampler but it's a real estate and cost issue. Essentially my range gate will be around 300psec and the sampling cannot happen more than about once per usec. So around 3000:1. Delta-V is a few tens to hundreds of uV.

I think I'll have to talk to the guys there. Things like Schottky barrier height aren't in the datasheets but their FAEs should know.

I haven't tried the diodes in a sampler yet because the sampler only exists on paper so far.

The sim shows about 120psec rise time. Open loop sampler. Essentially an RF BJT driven hard by a fast logic chip and then the collector signal is capacitively coupled into the sampler (fractions of a pF).

One of the challenges with a post-S&H is that there seem to be no ICs for that. The SMP04 still needs 4usec, too long, and it costs an arm and a leg. It's a pity they don't sell the fast samplers from ADCs sans the ADC. "I'd like to have burger and fries but without the burger".

--
Regards, Joerg 

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

I'll call Skyworks and see what else they can offer. Maybe something that isn't so mainstream at distributros but longterm available.

It needs to be something that's not unobtanium :-)

Like the mountain bike frame I was eyeing and now it's out of stock. Hurumph!

--
Regards, Joerg 

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

MGF1302 & friends have been workhorses for ham EME for decades... Someone still makes GaAsFETs, no????

:-) Gerhard

Reply to
Gerhard Hoffmann

Schottky, like Germanium diodes are inherently leaky (very similar that way) because of the low Vf. A standard plain silicon diode is far better and has a higher barrier height; thousands to choose from, and a fair number of fast ones at decent prices.

Reply to
Robert Baer

I did it with discretes; a low charge injection analog switch would work in the downstream s/h.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation
Reply to
John Larkin

Data sheet:

"Where to find MGF-1302's"

...and of course, there's eBay:

I use one in an antenna mounted preamp for my 1090 MHz ADS-B receiver. About 0.5dB NF and 20dB gain. Kinda overkill using a 4-8GHz GaAsFET at 1GHz, but they were cheap and easy to ummm... "borrow".

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

A mere 1N4148 for instance is already in the same ballpark as others (i.e., 1-2pF CJO, or something like that), while being a massively better conductor (Vf ~ 0.7V up to, what, a few 100mA, as compared to that BAR18 I mentioned which goes resistive in the 10s of mA). But do PN junction diodes exist with short enough forward and reverse recovery times to actually handle a 200ps pulse? Could one made of GaAs or whatever be better? ...Could a very small LED be suitable?

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs 
Electrical Engineering Consultation 
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
Reply to
Tim Williams

There are lots of nice analogue muxes with very low charge injection, and the dual-gate MOSFET trick works even better.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Pretty well has to be Schottky, because PN junctions of whatever sort have diffusion delays that slow things down very badly.

You can't do picosecond sampling with a 1N4148 because it doesn't turn on fast enough.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Too bad the terahertz detector methods couldn't be utilized downward abit. There seems to be more available with detecting that spectrum.

Devices like the Golay cell, bolometer, pyroelectric effect, the photo rectification (acoustic which I don't think would work any how)..

As for pulsing lasers onto a semi for a detector, I would think the semi would need to be of a large area for the Ghz, if it would work at all?

Jamie

etc..

Reply to
Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.

Yeah, that's the point pretty much. I already know a 1N4148 takes a nanosecond or so to do anything, besides blowing the CJO spec by about 5x. But I don't know if there's anything with faster diffusion (GaAs?) or thinner junctions that could do better.

Only other thing that comes to mind, then, would be a really small thermionic diode, which doesn't depend on diffusion, more or less (transport is ballistic). The best I have is a few of these,

formatting link
but they're physically much too large for sort of application (self resonant frequency 2.8GHz, plus the feed-throughs for the 5V 0.3A heater, each).

But really, even the engineers from the '40s knew the limits of their technology, and though there may be some planar diodes (with flange or coax terminals for mounting in waveguides or cavities), early "hot carrier" (schottky) diodes, e.g., cartridge style, were pretty much the way to go.

And hey, there's some on eBay right now:

formatting link
Geez, I can't even find specs on the things. Datasheets yes, but they're entirely about VSWR and noise figure -- not even about bias, let alone capacitance!

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs 
Electrical Engineering Consultation 
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
Reply to
Tim Williams

Be wary of the BJT response. I've pulsed all sorts of BJTs, including some of the 45 GHz SiGe parts, and have never seen especially fast output edges. Phemts are different; they can switch fast.

Sampling pulses are usually created with SRDs and clipping lines. The really fast samplers use NLTL shock lines.

SRD steps are usually pretty-fast steps that are made faster and cleaner with steering diodes. See Agoston's patents. People worked very hard to build samplers and step generators that had clean picosecond response.

I've done a little playing with software deconvolution for TDR. The idea is to build a fast but ugly sampling or TDR system and clean up its step response with a software FIR filter, the problem being how to train the filter.

formatting link

I have an algorithm that seems to work well, although I've never really understood it. It just seemed like a reasonable thing to do.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation
Reply to
John Larkin

Not at picosecond speeds, there aren't.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.