and motion relative to observer is fully defined decryption of motion event. There are no absolute points in space and space has no other properties but containment of matter. Creating a theory out of prime word such as "relative" is science fiction.
Mathew Orman
Do some self-education
You are nuttier than a fruitcake.
That is aside from the blatant stupidity factor.
I did. Here it is:
Mathew Orman
And you are fruitier than natcake.
That is aside from blatant logic factor.
Mathew Orman
So let's see, you read one whackadoodle site and from that you've become an expert.
I figured as much when you came out with the three basic forces of physics being gravitational, electrical, and magnetic, but it's nice to have it confirmed.
Hint--go to school, learn physics as it is currently understood, get your doctorate, and if you still think it's wrong and can prove it your Nobel is assured.
No, I did not study any of that. I am an electronics engineer and have strictly commercial gain intensions when posting on usernet. If a device can propagate information at FTL and it is useful in human life than that all it matters and the established physics theories have no effect at all.
Mathew Orman
nt.
Decryption?
ut
Really? Funny how we can measure properties for space. And space has geometry (ie dimensions).
.Indeed it is .. as noone makes a physics theory out of a word (even a 'prime' word .. whatever you think that means).
Really .. you're a moron
So you can measure empty space.... Please give me an example as I would like to know how you would do it.
Mathew Orman
"news.onet.pl" napisal w wiadomosci news:im7m7g$7a3$ snipped-for-privacy@news.onet.pl...
Too long to read. It is enough to read the sentence wrote by Albert in 1905: "Examples of this sort, together with the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively to the ``light medium,''
In 1925 Michelson and Gale detected the motion of the earth relatively to the ``light medium,''
Do you know that?
In the established physics the electricity is like an incompressible massless fluid. Have it effect on your electronics? S*
And did you know that the experiment cannot be reproduced?
ut
How do you know?
Logical deduction and experimental evidence.
Mathew Orman
s
Deduction from what? (Note that "It seems intuitive me" is not to be confused with logical deduction.)
What experimental evidence?
ter
Deducted from the set of prime definitions. And experimental evidence is unlimited. Just Google for any experiment and you will find that none detect a presence of absolute point or motion.
Mathew Orman
Definitions are assigned meanings to words. I can *define* "blue" and "beautiful" any way I want, but this doesn't mean I'll be able to deduce anything from those definitions that have any scientific truth.
And you seem to think that there is some set of "prime definitions" that people should agree on. What gives you that idea?
nce
I'm more interested in the claim that space has no properties other than containment of matter.
ter
The same experiments and no limits. None of them shows any space properties other than containment of matter.
Mathew Orman
You didn't respond to this question about your "prime definitions".
On the contrary, the impedance of empty space has been measured. So has its permittivity and permeability. As well as other things.
.
be
nd
.r.
Would you mind explaining to me the rationale behind your policy that things don't exist they have been explained to you and you understand them? You do realize that this is a policy that is guaranteed to perpetuate your ignorance, don't you?
On the contrary, the impedance of empty space has been measured. So has its permittivity and permeability. As well as other things.
=============================================== Quite right, Duck. So has the speed of sound in empty space, the colour of a black cat in a coal cellar at midnight and fish fingers. As well as other things, such as the extent of your insanity.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required