Re: Sen. Harry Reid, NV: Wildfires caused by global warming

[snip]
>Your health system only looks after those people who can pay.

Utter nonsense.

Your >public education system is an international laughing stock

So why do Europeons troop here for an education?

with >religious nutters mandating that evolution cannot be taught and 30% >dropout rates...

In one or two school districts in the whole USA.

>The big problem today is that there are a limited number of >opportunities for illiterate and innumerate manual labour in the first >world.

Must be why the Mexicans are flooding our country.

[snip]
>Regards, >Martin Brown

The big problem in the world is the utter brain washing foisted by the media, and believed by the truly ignorant.

...Jim Thompson

--
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
             
         America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
Reply to
Jim Thompson
Loading thread data ...

It certainly does a lot less for people who can't pay than it does for people with health insurance and a lot less than the UK or Cuban health services would.

As I understand it, Michael Moore's "Sicko" dramatised the point by flying a bunch of indigient U.S. patients to Cuba ...

Your public health statistics don't compare well with those of poorer countries - here's infant mortality.

formatting link

To perfect their English, mostly.

So why do so many of their graduates post here?

The average Mexican immigrant isn't illiterate.

Sure, and Jim is a prize example of the gullible ignoramus.

-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Reply to
bill.sloman

snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org posted to sci.electronics.design:

Such interesting data. In 1960 the US was not even in the top 10 for lowest infant mortality, and it still is not. Yet in the intervening years the US rate for infant mortality dropped by 2/3 (from 26 per thousand to 7.1 per thousand). Most of the 1960 top ten is not 1999 top 10 in spite of 50% or better reductions in infant mortality. The data reflects not so much failure of the US, but raising of the standard worldwide, largely made possible by exports of US medical advances.

Not nearly a tenth as gullable as you Bill.

Reply to
JosephKK

The infant mortality data is a gimmick often cited by detractors ignorant of certain facts.

Among other things, we count *all* births, whereas various 'leading' countries do not count still-borns, low-birth weight babies, preemies, babies born with fatal defects, and generally, babies not judged to be 'viable' at birth.

You'll notice the document Bill linked says "Data are based on reporting by countries." That's a disclaimer, and that's why they need it.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
James Arthur

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.