>
>
>
>
> > > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >> Scare of the day...
>
> > > >> The clearly written 2nd Amendment:
>
> > > >> "The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infrin=
ged"
> > > >> yesterday was _almost_ trashed by the leftist weenies on the Supre=
me
> > >> Court.
>
> > > >> Fortunately, by a 5:4 decision, the leftist weenies were NOT able =
to
> > >> trash one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed to us under ou=
r
> > >> wonderfully written Constitution.
>
> > > >> Elect Obama, and you may rest assured that won't be the only right=
you
> > >> will lose.
>
> > > >> Make my day... kick a leftist weenie's ass ;-)
>
> > > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson
> > >> --
> > > >> | James E.Thompson, P.E. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0mens =A0 =A0 |
> > >> | Analog Innovations, Inc. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0 et =A0 =A0 =A0|
> > >> | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems =A0| =A0 =A0manu=
s =A0 =A0|
> > >> | Phoenix, Arizona =A085048 =A0 =A0Skype: Contacts Only =A0| =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 |
> > >> | Voice:(480)460-2350 =A0Fax: Available upon request | =A0Brass Ra=
t =A0|
> > >> | E-mail Icon at
formatting link
|=A0 =A01962 =A0 =
=A0 |
> > >> | =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|
> > >> | =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Vote Barack... Help Make America an Obama-nation =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|
> > >> | =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|
> > >> | =A0Due to excessive spam, googlegroups, UAR & AIOE are blocked! =
=A0|
> > > >If the "leftist weenies" on the court had prevailed, the result woul=
d
> > >have been upholding DC's handgun-ban law. =A0How would =A0that have =
had
> > >any effect on you?
>
> > > >What is it that you are scared of?
>
> > > You clearly have no understanding of the impact of DC's
> > > unconstitutional gun laws, safey, or the concept of freedom, and
> > > governement BY THE PEOPLE.
>
> > > Here's a test:
>
> > > Which has lower gun problems:
>
> > > DC with it's idiotic gun restrictions, or
> > > NH with no gun restrictions.
>
> > No possible ruling by the Supreme Court in this case could have
> > applied the DC law to NH.
>
> You *clearly* don't understand the power of such a ruling.
I guess not. Please explain.