>formatting link
>
> There's no fundamantal reason why a high-frequency radar couldn't
> image the insides of a house, at sufficient resolution to make fuzzy
> pics of objects, walls, people, and pets.
>
>
> "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
> papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
> not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
> supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
> place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
>
> suggests to me that a warrant would be needed to peep inside a house.
>
>
> I'm still waiting for the impulse-radar imaging stud finder for $29.95
> at Home Depot. Maybe a heat gun and a thermal imager would find studs;
> gotta try that.
>
>
> --
>
Studs show up well with a thermal imager. Hot and cold water pipes do also.