Re: Flexibility of hours for EEs

What a shame. A rookie is teaching the great John Larkin how to make a trivial flyback. Despite of the fact that the flyback was probably invented on the 2nd day of the world...

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky
Loading thread data ...

A laptop with loaded software is as many times more sophisticated then the 747 as the total number of laptops higher then the total number of 747s.

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

What a shame. Your pompous, non-productive ass should be fired.

...Jim Thompson

--
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
             
         America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
Reply to
Jim Thompson

What do you know, old fool.

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

Has anybody ever taken the time to teach you how to snip?

Jim

-- "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, with chocolate in one hand and wine in the other, loudly proclaiming 'WOO HOO What a Ride!'"

--Unknown

Reply to
RST Engineering (jw)

Would you care to try that again in English?

Jim

-- "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, with chocolate in one hand and wine in the other, loudly proclaiming 'WOO HOO What a Ride!'"

--Unknown

Reply to
RST Engineering (jw)

Now there's your problem....

A good engineer will use whatever technology gets the job done "best."

You apparently do your work according to what looks best to those around you.

Reply to
Don Bowey

What an id10t. Do you have ANY idea how much computer controlled electronics is used on modern aircraft?

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Obviously, he knows enough to spot a "Pompous, non-productive ass" like you. Considering that you've never met face to face, that is quite an accomplishment.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

I see you also discriminate on the basis of age. You really should be more careful.

Reply to
Don Bowey

You can't teach a troll anything. Next, he'll be claiming that you're stalking him.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Absurd. Windows isn't sophisticated, it's just huge, clumsy, buggy, unpredictable, and bloated. The ADA-based software that runs in an jet-engine control computer is sophisticated. It's developed using a certified-correct compiler, exhaustively reviewed and simulated (sometimes using my VME gear) and, to my knowledge, has never killed anyone.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

The flyback we have in mind is not going to be trivial. But when it's done, it will be, or at least look, simple. Trivial simple.

The first flyback I know of was used in a WWII sniperscope IR converter. It furnished about -1500 volts and would run for several weeks on one D cell.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

You just gave a good lesson. Thank you.

The Tesla transformer was invented about 100 years before that. Although I doubt the availability of D cells and especially IR sniperscopes at the times of WWII.

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

Unfortunately, there are objective reasons for the things to be that way. Nobody does bad job on purpose. If it would be possible to make it nice and straightforward, somebody would certainly do that. Also, it depends on the proficiency of the user working with Windows.

This is a different story. A relatively small device which probably took at least 2-3 years to develop and it is going to be in production for another 10-15 years. Yes, it can be polished to perfection. But do you remember what was Windows 10 years ago?

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

Far more than you ever will... basturd (and that's NOT misspelled ;-)

...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | |

formatting link
| 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Reply to
Jim Thompson
[somebody wrote]

Pretty much what it is now - a 32-bit graphical shell on a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit OS that was developed for a 4-bit microprocessor by a two-bit company that doesn't care one bit about its customers.

Cheers! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Yeah - the same guy who taught you to bottom-post.

Cheers! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Just one question:

Assume some people are as great engineers as they are trying to tell us. If Windows is so awfull bad, then why didn't they suggest anything better? That doesn't seem very logical.

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

Have you ever heard of Apple Computer? Linux? Etc...........

Reply to
Don Bowey

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.