Quick, quick...

Take guns away from whom?

Chortle! Calling me a leftist is about as wide of the mark as you could get!. If I were in your country I'd probably be labelled a TeaPartyist.

sources.

You're lying, though perhaps to yourself.

No, you certainly wouldn't. The tea party is about rights, and the Constitution, something which you obviously have no use for.

Yes, and in a society saturated with firearms the probability of the two coming together is higher than in a generally unarmed society.

Like happens all the time in countries with effective gun control -- or does it?

That's nothing to shout about! Have you listened carefully to any of them?

No, but I will say that you're just a s*it stirrer.

Europe: Can't get a gun to use on your target? Blow up the building.

I killfiled the "s*it stirrer". He ignored my request for comparing crime rate statistics, UK vs US. And further ignored it when I posted how atrociously higher the UK rate is. ...Jim Thompson

Have you? ...or have you listened to MSNBC speak for them?

MSNBC? Not something we indulge in over here.

I guess that's price of freedom, after all it's only foul language.

If I am in your killfile I must be doing something right!

Goodness knows where you get your "facts" from, the Daily Mail or Fox News I suppose. Certainly not from official UK government statistics.

So you really have *NO* idea what you're talking about. Figures, another Slowman.

Ironic really. krw has no idea what he is talking about, except that he knows that he agrees with every other right wing US nitwit who posts here, particularly when they post ill-informed nonsense.

use

does

ding.

It's been a while since a building got blown up in Europe (except for intentional demolition). We've lost a few buses and trains.

You lost the World Trade Centre to the same people, armed with nothing more lethal than a box cutter.

sources.

You clearly have no idea.

I have no use for YOUR constitution.

sources.

You're either lying to us here, or to yourself (probably both).

Then why do you even post on the topic, stupid? Your noise *really* isn't needed or wanted. You really are another Slowman.

Tea simply stands for T-axed E-nough A-lready. The premise is: we're taxed enough, the problem is spending.

We're taking in plenty of revenue (it could be more if Barack would allow it), but Washington's spending 23% more (of GDP) than under Clinton, and the states are spending a lot more too.

We're spending too much--so far this year Washington's spent $1.84 per dollar in revenue. Secondly, they're spending it badly, wasting it.

So, that sounds crazy...how?

It's pretty good, actually, but often misunderstood.